Under Rule 46.5 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) in England and Wales, a litigant in person (someone representing themselves in legal proceedings) is entitled to recover reasonable costs. These costs are typically limited to:
1.
Expenses Incurred:
This includes court fees, travel expenses, and other necessary disbursements
directly related to the case.
2. Time Spent: Litigants in person can claim for the time they spend preparing and presenting their case. The hourly rate is capped at a specific amount, which is currently £19 per hour, unless the court decides otherwise based on the complexity of the case.
The court assesses what is
"reasonable" based on the nature of the case, the work done, and
whether the costs claimed are proportionate and necessary.
You can find more details about Rule 46.5 on the official or the .
Justice UK website
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part-46-costs-special-cases
or the
Civil Procedure Rules page
The hourly rate
of £19 for litigants in person was established under Rule 46.5 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR)
in England and Wales. This rate has been in place since 2014, as part of the guidelines
for recovering costs by litigants in person. It allows individuals representing
themselves in legal proceedings to claim for their time spent on the case,
capped at £19 per hour unless they can prove actual financial loss.
·
To adjust the £19 hourly rate for
inflation since 2014, we can use the UK's average inflation rates
over the past decade. Based on historical inflation data, the cumulative
inflation rate from 2014 to 2024 is approximately 30%.
Using this, the adjusted hourly rate would be:
£19 × 1.30 = £24.70
· So, the equivalent value of £19 in 2014 would be approximately £24.70 today, accounting for inflation. If you'd like, I can guide you to an inflation calculator for more precise calculations.
Based on the information available, Ahmed Jama is a director at AAJ Brokers Ltd. However, it's not clear if he directly handles compensation claims or if there's a specific department responsible for such matters. Typically, in larger companies, claims are managed by a dedicated customer service or claims department, and the director may not be directly involved in the day-to-day handling of individual claims.
https://www.companydirectorcheck.com/ahmed-jama-17
To get a more accurate understanding of the company structure and who would
authorize your claim, it might be best to contact Trip.com's customer service
directly and inquire about their claims process and the relevant department or
person responsible for authorizing claims.
Ahmed Jamal Mussiy ⇒ Free Company Director Check
In criminal proceedings, the additional request you're referring to is
likely a Disclosure Request. Under
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), section 30 specifically deals with
information held for the purposes of criminal investigations and proceedings.
This section allows public authorities to withhold information if its
disclosure would prejudice the investigation or prosecution of a criminal
offense.
In civil proceedings, the rules around disclosure are governed by the Civil
Procedure Rules (CPR), particularly Part 31, which deals with
the disclosure and inspection of documents. Under these rules, each party is
required to disclose documents that are relevant to the case. However, there
are certain exceptions where a party can withhold documents, such as when the
documents are privileged or if their disclosure would be disproportionate to
the issues in the case.
If Ahmed Jama or any other party is withholding policies or documents that
are relevant to the litigation, you can make a request for Specific
Disclosure under Rule 31.12 of the CPR. This rule allows you to
apply to the court for an order requiring the other party to disclose specific
documents or classes of documents that are relevant to the case.
To summarize:
1. Criminal
Proceedings: Use a Disclosure Request under FOIA section 30.
2. Civil
Proceedings: Use a Specific Disclosure request under CPR Rule
31.12.
criminal
investigations and proceedings
PART
31 – DISCLOSURE AND INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part31
Working Hours Ahmed Jama
a)
Thursday, 13 March 2025, at 09:21
GMT
b)
Thursday, 13 March 2025, at 17:18
GMT
c)
Friday, 28 February 2025, at 16:41
GMT
d)
Monday, 3 March 2025, at 15:21 GMT
e) Thursday, 6 March 2025, at 14:26 GMT
Date:
12/03/2025
Withinside
the “10th Email I Sent to you!” is a section
This is wrong all these trains were running as part of the Delys,
I could not have made the first out of them because it was to be at Gatwick airport
at 12:00pm. The first train was rain Service: From East Grinstead
was
1) 12:12 PM (1L35
service) “We Would Have Missed This, Train!”
As it takes longer than 12 minutes to get to East Grinstead
from Gatwick by coach.
This means I could have only arrived at East Grinstead for
the second train
2) 1:12 PM “We Would Have Just Arrived For This
Train As I Remember!”
My ticket to be at East Grinstead is 12:32 and this train
was cancelled but still sold to me in the know-how and this is proved by the
comment:
1)
“The 12 PM
Service Was Always Scheduled As A Replacement Bus Service,”