Detailed Compensation Claim for Simon Paul Cordell

Name: Simon Paul Cordell Address: 109 Burncroft Avenue, Enfield, London, EN3 7JQ Email: Re_wired@ymail.com Tel: +447864217519 Date: 09 February 2025.

Recipient's Name: Southern Railway Customer Service

·         https://www.thetrainline.com/trains/great-britain/delay-repay

·         https://www.thameslinkrailway.com/help-and-support/delay-repay

·         https://www.thameslinkrailway.com/-/media/goahead/gtr-all-shared-pdfs-and-documents/delay_repay_post_form.pdf

Subject: Claim for Compensation Due to Train Delays and Associated Issues

Dear Southern Railway Customer Service,

I am writing to formally file a claim for compensation due to significant disruptions to my travel on January 12, 2025. My planned journey from Gatwick to London Bridge was severely impacted by the cancellation of train services, which resulted in additional expenses and a loss of productivity.

Journey Details:

·         Date: January 12, 2025

·         Route: Train from Gatwick to London Bridge

·         Scheduled Trains:

o    12:00 PM Southern train from Gatwick to East Grinstead

o    12:32 PM Southern train from East Grinstead to London Bridge

·         Ticket Price: £11.90 each x 2 = £23.80

Caption for Receipt: Purchase of Train Travel Tickets.

Upon arrival at Gatwick, I learned that the scheduled train services were cancelled, and a coach service was provided instead. The coach journey took approximately 45 minutes to reach an alternate train station before we could continue our journey, and I took a picture while on the train as below:

Caption for Receipt: Late Train Service Provided as An Alternative to Travel.

Alternative Transport:

·         Coach Service: Provided as an alternative to train travel.

·         Arrival Issues: Once at London Bridge, my attempts to contact the cab driver were unsuccessful, as the timing of our arrival did not allow for proper communication. I enlisted the assistance of my uncle, who was able to attempt to reach the cab company on our behalf. Unfortunately, we were informed that we could not recover our booking or fees for the taxi we missed.

·         Missed Cab Booking: Cab price £51.50.

Caption for Receipt: Cab Booking Booked at The Same Time with Train Tickets.

Consequently, we took the Route 149 bus to Edmonton Green while managing multiple suitcases.

·         Bus Fees: £1.75 x 2 = £3.50.

Caption for Receipt: TFL travel charge for bus fare on January 13, 2025.

Upon arriving in Edmonton Green, I opted for a cab as it was more affordable than attempting to recover the missed booking.

·         Cab Fare: £13.00.

Caption for Receipt: Cab from Edmonton Green.

Impact: The delays not only caused distress but also led to fatigue, making it impossible for me to prepare dinner upon arriving home. As a result, I was forced to order food, an expense I wouldn't have incurred had I arrived on time.

·         Dinner Bill: £25.00.

Caption for Receipt: Dinner Receipt.

More significantly, I lost an entire day of work that I had planned to dedicate to developing my business. This lack of productivity stems from unexpected delays caused by the train service's operational failures and were not a result of any fault on our part as customers. Based on my potential earnings from business development activities, I estimate the value of my lost time to be £80.

Caption for Receipt: Lost Downtime.

Compensation Request: It is crucial to note that the failure to board was not due to our actions as passengers, but rather the result of train cancellations and delays. Therefore, I am requesting compensation under the delay repay scheme, which compensates passengers for inconvenience and financial losses incurred due to service disruptions.

Specific Amounts Claimed:

1.          Train Tickets: £11.90 Each X2 £23.80 Each

2.          Missed Cab Booking: £51.50

3.          Bus Fees X2: £3.50

4.          Cab Fare: £13.00

5.          Dinner Bill: £25.00

6.          Lost Downtime: £80.00

§  Total Amount Claimed: £196.80P

Justification for Full Recovery of Additional Costs and Tickets

I am writing to request a review and reversal of the decision regarding my compensation claim for the delay experienced with my day ticket on January 12, 2025. Given the significant disruption and the associated financial and emotional impact, I firmly believe that my case warrants full recovery of my ticket costs and additional expenses incurred.

 

Relevant Regulations and Standards

According to the Thameslink Delay Repay scheme and the National Rail Conditions of Travel, passengers holding day tickets are entitled to compensation if they experience delays. Specifically, the compensation guidelines for day ticket holders are as follows:

Given the above guidelines and the details of my journey, I firmly believe that my claim falls within the parameters of the compensation scheme. However, my situation involves exceptional circumstances that necessitate a departure from the standard compensation policy.

Exceptional Circumstances and Financial Impact

  1. Prolonged Delay and Missed Appointments:
  2. Incurred Additional Costs:
  3. Impact on Work and Productivity:
  4. Compensation for Emotional Distress and Inconvenience:

Consumer Rights and Fair Treatment

According to the Consumer Rights Act 2015, services must be provided with reasonable care and skill. When service providers fail to meet this standard, consumers are entitled to remedies, including compensation for consequential losses. Furthermore, the Railways Act 1993 mandate’s that train operators must adhere to principles of fairness and transparency in their dealings with passengers.

Given these points, I kindly request a full recovery of my tickets and reimbursement for the additional costs incurred. The compensation should reflect the totality of the financial impact and inconvenience experienced, beyond the standard delay repay guidelines. This consideration is crucial for a fair resolution to the significant disruptions caused by the train service cancellations.

I have included all relevant documentation and imagery to support my claim. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to your prompt response.

Sincerely, Simon Paul Cordell 109 Burncroft Avenue, Enfield, London, EN3 7JQ Re_wired@ymail.com +447864217519

Enclosures:

·         Receipt: Purchase of TFL Train Travel Tickets:

 

A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

 

·         Receipt: Late Train service provided as an alternative to travel:

 

·         Receipt: Cab Booking Booked at The Same Time with Train Tickets:

 

·         Receipt: TFL travel charge for bus fare on January 13, 2025:

 

·         Receipt: Cab from Edmonton Green:

 

·         Receipt: Dinner Receipt:

To be obtained!

 

·         Receipt: Lost Downtime:

Web linked as: Horrific Corruption: Uncovering the Dark Truth's.

 

·         Receipt: All Additional Relevant Documents:

None to be added!

 

 End

 

 

 

Added extra not sent

 

The fairness of a company's compensation policy can depend on several factors, including the terms and conditions under which the service was provided, consumer protection laws, and industry standards. Here are a few key considerations:

1. Consumer Rights

Under laws such as the Consumer Rights Act 2015 in the UK, services must be provided with reasonable care and skill. If a service fails to meet this standard, consumers may be entitled to remedies, including compensation for consequential losses. The act emphasizes fairness and transparency in commercial practices.

2. Company Policies and Transparency

Companies should clearly communicate their compensation policies, including any limitations or exclusions. Transparency is crucial to ensuring that consumers are aware of their rights and the terms of the service they are purchasing. If a company's policy is perceived as unfair or misleading, it could be challenged under consumer protection laws.

3. Industry Standards

Compensation policies should align with industry standards and best practices. For instance, many transport and travel companies have delay compensation schemes that provide a sliding scale of compensation based on the length of the delay. These schemes are often subject to regulatory oversight to ensure they are fair and reasonable.

4. Regulatory Oversight

Regulatory bodies, such as the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) in the UK for railway services, oversee compensation schemes to ensure they comply with legal and regulatory requirements. If a compensation policy is found to be unfair or not compliant with regulations, the company may be required to amend it.

5. Unfair Terms

Under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, any term that causes a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations to the detriment of the consumer may be considered unfair. Consumers can challenge such terms and seek redress.

In summary, while companies can set their own compensation policies, these must comply with relevant consumer protection laws, industry standards, and regulatory requirements. If you believe a company's compensation policy is unfair, you may have grounds to challenge it, either through direct negotiation or by seeking advice from consumer protection organizations.

If you need further assistance with a specific issue, feel free to ask! 😊