Here’s the detailed alignment of evidence and document sections supporting the claim for “Food Expenses at Luton Airport,” using Exhibits A to N and Exhibits 1 to 34:

Alignment of Exhibits with "Food Expenses at Luton Airport"

Exhibit Reference	Description	Relevance to Claim
Exhibit I	Food and Drink Expenses Receipt at Luton Airport (Burger King)	Documents showing the £23 spent on food and drinks while waiting for the rebooked flight at Luton Airport, showing an unanticipated cost incurred due to delays caused by Trip.com errors.

Relevant Sections of the Document Supporting the Claim

Section Title	Details Supporting "Food Expenses at Luton Airport"
Journey Details: Luton Airport	Details the unexpected costs incurred due to the claimant being redirected to Luton Airport after the missed flight at Gatwick, including food expenses during the wait for the rebooked flight.
Analysis and Findings	Highlights the financial impact of delays caused by Trip.com, which necessitated additional expenses, such as food, while waiting for the alternative flight.

Key Evidence from "Exhibits 1 to 34"

Exhibit #	Details
Exhibit 9	Receipt from Burger King at Luton Airport showing the cost of food and drinks purchased while waiting for the rebooked flight.
Exhibit 19	Testimonies from affected passengers highlighting additional costs, including food and drink expenses, caused by delays.

Key Points of the Claim

1. Unanticipated Cost Due to Delays: The £23 spent on food and drinks at Luton Airport was a direct result of the missed flight at Gatwick and subsequent rebooking arrangements, which led to a lengthy waiting period.
2. Documentation of Expenses: The receipt from Burger King provides clear evidence of the expense incurred while at Luton Airport.
3. Impact of Trip.com’s Errors: The financial burden of this expense is a direct consequence of the delays and disruptions caused by Trip.com’s misinformation and booking errors.

This structured summary ties the “Food Expenses at Luton Airport” claim to specific exhibits and document sections, providing robust evidence to support this claim.