Published:

19 comments

Rory Geoghegan is Head of Criminal Justice at the Centre for Social Justice.

The Justice Secretary’s recognition that short-term prison sentences do little to tackle root causes is well-received. But most community sentences do little to help either – and don’t even give victims a brief respite.

As voter concern about law, order, and crime grows, with almost one in four voters giving it top billing – a seven year high, and up from 8th to 3rd place in just a couple of months – the need to reboot crime policy looks set to grow. The most persistent offenders are very often those addicted to drugs like heroin and crack cocaine. Injecting heroin users can easily commit 260 or more crimes per year, and we know that 70 per cent of shop thefts and almost half of all acquisitive crime is committed by those who use one or more of heroin and crack cocaine.

The driver of their offending is their addiction. Tony Blair’s government sought to get “tough on crime” and “tough on the causes of crime” – but only with mixed success. One of the great achievements was to create a focus upon prolific drug-addicted offenders and the Integrated Offender Management approach. But there remains much to be done: within both the Home Office and Ministry of Justice briefs. At a time when David Gauke and Rory Stewart, the Prisons Minister, rightly describe the flaws with short-term prison sentences for many offenders, we should not pretend that non-custodial sentences fare much better for this cohort.

The Government’s new female offender strategy, due very soon, looks set to signal what appetite or ambition exists to get serious about the causes of crime. Offenders and victims alike gain little from a system that dishes out sentences that amount to little more than half-hearted box-checking and that are wholly ineffective at tackling the root causes of crime.

Our latest Centre for Social Justice report – Desperate for a Fix – focuses on prolific drug-addicted offenders and proposes a new Second Chance Programme that blends the necessary combination of intensity and duration to finally tackle the root causes of the most prolific drug-addicted offending. We focus our assessment on shop theft – one of the most prevalent offences – and one that features in the criminal careers of many prolific offenders, especially those addicted to hard drugs. Going directly after shop theft as the trigger for the Second Chance Programme, sends a clear “tough on crime” signal, while also creating the space for an equally “tough on the causes of crime” effort in the form of intensive and sustained drug treatment and recovery.

The first phase would be in secure accommodation – incapacitating the offender from further acquisitive crime, and enabling detox, stabilisation, and sustained progress on drug treatment and recovery.

The second phase would be set firmly within a residential therapeutic community – building on and cementing the work towards a life free of drugs and crime.

The programme is not entirely without precedent – with both Australia and the Netherlands having similar programmes aimed at the most prolific drug-addicted offenders. The best evidence suggests that a 15-17 per cent reduction in both drug use and offending could be achieved.

And if just one in 20 of those participating turned their backs on drugs and crime, then the programme would more than pay for itself. An investment of approximately £50 million a year over five years would enable up to 10,000 of the most prolific drug-addicted offenders to participate in the Second Chance Programme – with funding pooled from central and local sources.

In addition to helping clear up estates, towns, and inner cities, the Second Chance Programme also presents an opportunity for Police and Crime Commissioners to unite local partners in the fight against crime and the causes of crime more broadly. Coupled with investment to build on the CSJ’s Housing First pilots announced in the Autumn Budget, the opportunity exists to transform the landscape for drug treatment and recovery – and to cut crime and improve the quality of life in some of our poorest communities in the process.

19 comments for: Rory Geoghegan: Short-term prison sentences do nothing for prolific offenders. We must get serious about tackling the causes of crime.

Comments (19)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Login or signup now to comment.
If short sentences are not working, how about trying longer sentences?
Reply
1 reply · active 56 weeks ago
How about freeing up prison spaces and having longer prison sentences
you could also make it less cosy inside.

That hookhanded terrorist preacher we eventually deported not so long ago
who is now imprisoned in the US has asked the human rights courts if
he can be sent back to a UK prison as they are nicer and let him keep
his hook hands of which were removed as soon as he was imprisoned in
the US.

Might I suggest we deport all immigrant criminals of his calibre and similar-
their human rights are not our concern and we as tax payers shouldn't have to
pay for their incarceration.
Reply
I should imagine there are those who even reoffend to basically get back inside
because life in prison is better for them then life outside for some.
Reply
10 replies · active 56 weeks ago
" An investment of approximately £50 million a year over five years would enable up to 10,000 of the most prolific drug-addicted offenders to participate in the Second Chance Programme ". Doing the math, this is an expenditure of £5000 per offender. Seriously? This covers a stay in secure accommodation to detox and then in a residential therapeutic community. For how long? Do these facilities exist or would they need to be built and staffed? For £5000 per offender. This proposal needs a lot more detail to make any sense, if it ever does.
Reply
It seems sensible to try a pilot scheme in one area of the country. Ensure it is well staffed, rather than setting it up to fail. Then if it works, you have a basis to roll it out, with some staff with experience to help do so. If it fails, then the cost will have been modest, and we will be looking for other solutions. Indeed, if others wish to propose solutions, why not let them be tried in different areas of the country, to see which are effective? Long sentences in London, supervised drug therapy in Leeds.
Reply
We've just had a dumb oaf on the Daily Politics saying the causes of crime are gangs - demonstrating he's unable to grasp the meaning of simple English words or knows what a synonym is. The causes of crime have been known for decades: they start in childhood where vulnerable children are reared by inadequate, stupid, feckless or unlucky parents. The infamous Coalition of callous fools cut the funding for the Sure Start nurseries that were making progress with this very issue - caring for children and educating parents. Not something private nurseries have the will, the expertise, the sense of responsibility or the intelligence to do. The ultimate causes of our present anarchy on the streets are narcissistic ministers travelling about in armoured limos- selfishness - a simple word that even an MP can understand.
Reply

Comments by