Speaker 1: 00:01 Now,
I know that there is a lot of history behind this case. What you have been laid
down as the initial incident is not the start of these problems.
New Speaker: 00:07 t
is just the starting of it. I also understand that you have been quite
concerned about my mental health and that you think that because of this,
because of what is actually happening to me that I should be explaining that.
Yeah. This has had deterioration on my Mental Health but from me understanding
the laws of the land that I represent I understand that under my Article 3 of
my Human Rights.
New Speaker: 00:28 If
a person just write Article 3 in; it will just come up with the layman terms
the short summary, but you actually write; physical or mental sufferings will
amount to Torture and then you will see that the acceptance of the key elements
to what can happen to a person when someone is degraded by another person that
that can become Torture, it doesn't mean that person's mentally ill to be
mentally ill in any form of way. I have been checked by the doctors 130 times
on different days now, since this has happened.
New Speaker: 00:56 And
every time the doctor have said that there is nothing wrong with me and that I
am very sane in the mind and that they've never been up to hold any section
anything any section 3 or anything else on me.
New Speaker: 01:11 After
my assessments that they have done and they have looked at my paperwork and
they have read it in black and white and they have said that you are right
Simon this is illegal what they are doing to you.
New Speaker: 01:19 Yeah,
They're detaining me in my house for seven years for something that I never
done. The first Asbo the Council have made four applications against me now,
New Speaker: 01:31 The
first Asbo, which was forged, now that first Asbo is missing the signatures at
the bottom of it there is no victims in the whole Asbo application and now I am
ridding seven years for it. Yeah, the maximum sentence under the Raves Bill if
you was arrested for it, is six months So if they didn't have enough evidence
under the under criminal conviction to arrest me and to get me into prison. How
have they extended the time limits and they couldn't understand the Standalone
Asbo.
New Speaker: 01:58 There
was multiple things that were wrong with the application and they realized how
much trouble they was in when i was winding up the
call centre at first and this is why they have done this scheme because I was
calling the call centre explaining what was inside of the folder.
New Speaker: 02:14 I
understand that Lemmy in creating a possession order.
New Speaker: 02:15 In
2016 for instance, which is one claim that said err, some tires have been done
and one claimant that said that I told him that I am going to get him in the
park.
New Speaker: 02:21 After
two years of them attacking me and me doing nothing. Me acting in self-defence
two years later telling these people to get away. The police won't protect me
and no one else will and that was the minimum that I could do to protect myself
from them and what they've been getting away with. Yeah.
New Speaker: 02:41 As
the emails prove. Now basically I know that Lemmy, when you create the
possession order he done exactly the same thing.
New Speaker: 02:46 He
never got the statements of Stain, of John Irvon, or
of any of the other people. He never took new statements and built the
possession order
Speaker 1: 02:57 What
he actually done is he has a line manager who is called Kinichewa
and now Konichiwa was dealing with the criminal
prosecution which was three cases one for stain one for them and one for them
lot in the from the 16 that i am on about for the
tiers and the thing.
New Speaker: 03:09 And
what the witness care team done was Met from Hackney. Was Crown prosecution
they messaged Konichiwa and said that there is no
evidence in this case and that we are throwing all three of them out of the
court and they throw all three of them out of the court on the 14 of September
no August 2016.
New Speaker: 03:19 She
messaged Lemmy because i have got all of the Emails
of it all I have got all the emails between the prosecution and between Konichiwa them messaging each other from a freedom of
Information. So she told Konichiwa there's no case in
this no more. Then Lemmy has come to these people's houses and he said to them,
there is no case cause Konichiwa told him that and
handed them incident diaries. Because
New Speaker: 03:47 Now,
he kept forcing himself into here houses and making them do more statements. So
he took them same cases that the Crown Prosecution throw out and he built a
possession order out of them.
New Speaker: 03:51 these
lot had not giving him fresh statements so he had no statements for the
possession order.
New Speaker: 03:51 order,
New Speaker: 04:08 So
if you look at john Ivons statement he has tippexed out at the top of it and he's wrote in pen the new
dates and no one has signed underneath it john Ivons
did not know that this case was happening.
New Speaker: 04:20 So,
when we went to court and we called for the hearsay rules 1995 and said that we
want a trial.
New Speaker: 04:21 Lemmy
ha got all stuck because he's got not true victims. like the first Asbo but
what he also done was he took the paperwork from the first Asbo yeah. The bail
conditions and he put that into the possession order. Yeah. And he's did not
just put any paperwork in there he put the one when they subliminal threatened
me inside of it yeah. In that possession order. Are you still there Annual and
basically, I'm sorry that is so long? And that it is a lot of your time I am
taking. And so, basically by him doing that. He, I have recordings of me
speaking to Lemmy, just prior Saying to Lemmy that this is out of order what
you are doing to me Lemmy please. Can you explain to me what your first
complaint is? I got this on recording He phoned me on the 6th of 2017 the six months
yeah. Now, I said to him in that conversation. Lemmy please, can you go into
the computer and can you tell me the last complaint ever made about me? He goes
into the computer and you can hear him typing.
New Speaker: 05:18 and
he goes on 1st of January, 2017 so I lead Lemmy in the conversation and go oh
well everything that you are accusing me of is out of the Time Limitation Act
in that possession order under the 1980 rules So, you can't proceed with that.
And less than three days later four days later he served me the Injunction
Order
New Speaker: 05:28 but
then he added an extra 42 no 22 incidents in it. that were not out of the Time
Limitation Act
New Speaker: 05:44 So
how can you get 22 incidents in less than four days. er, of him admitting on
the computer on the phone the dates
New Speaker: 05:48 Every
one that days is a copy and paste of the rest of them aggressively banging,
aggressively banging, aggressively banging doing this doing that. That is why
we have looked at this Injunction order and you can see it looks such a mess
and now you will seem so similar the accounts. To each other and I am not happy
about it and I am upset for it, for the situation that i
am in and the position that they have put you into again and that I have done
nothing wrong.
New Speaker: 06:06 [Blank.]
Speaker 2: 06:27 Okay.
Speaker 1: 06:30 I
have a response bundle and I have lot of video evidence that I would like to
get transcribed up, which proves that they are attacking me every day from 2014
of me phoning up the police station and asking them to protect me and it proves
what these lot have really done to me and the neglect and the breaches of their
statutory duties from the personnel the reasonable people who are working under
the company head of Enfield Council towards me and it shows that they have,
they have intrusively decided to invade my privacy and my private life and what
they have done is done in such a reckless way
New Speaker: 06:58 [Blank.]
New Speaker: 06:58 it
has caused me distress and emotional sufferings.
New Speaker: 07:50 [Blank.]
New Speaker: 07:50 Yeah
so, on the second occasion that I come to see and you asked me and no, the
first ever time I come to your office and see you asked me do I have Mental
Health problems and I explained that you had met my mother once before and I
explained to you No I don't and you explained to me that my mother had
explained to you she had.
New Speaker: 08:07 [inaudible].
She is mistaken in what your / what she is explaining to you. I have learning
difficulties yes but there is nothing wrong with my Mental Stability
New Speaker: 08:07 [Blank.]
New Speaker: 08:48 Yeah
I have got evidence to put in for this case and in defence in properly and I
would like to give you the video evidence of that and my report and then I
would like for that to be served in my response bundle to the other party and
that and I would like a good barrister that would represent me in my proceedings
and I will 100% win the case I have just been on the phone to the claimant
solicitor and I've been explaining to them about Lemmy and Lumia breaching
there stationery duties. I think that they are going to be calling the other
solicitor firm anyway. After they talk to you and served your firm like that I
got upset so I just contacted them up about them
New Speaker: 09:02 Just
contacted them and I recorded them I am not recording our conversation.
New Speaker: 09:14 Si
Note: [I never realized that I had left the recorder on]
New Speaker: 09:14 but
I record.
New Speaker: 09:14 [Blank.]
Speaker 3: 09:19 there
solicitor from right now is, I'll give you the name of them. I've just spoke to
the executive director and explained to her what was going to be happening. I
think they've just realized how much trouble they're in and Kerwin's
K .I .R .W.A.N.S. solicitor firm.
Speaker 1: 09:36 Yeah.
Pardon?
Speaker 3: 09:43 What?
What's, I did not understand the question.
New Speaker: 09:47 [Blank.].
New Speaker: 09:47 Yeah.
Kirwan's K .I .R .W.A.N.S. Kirwans solicitor firm and the case handler is the Miller,
L. U. D M. I. L. L. A. yeah. Lemmy, Lemmy, she represents this solicitor from
Kirwans, solicitor firm and she, what she was is she would done five years
training and after that training. She started working for Kirwans solicitor
firm Kirwans.
New Speaker: 10:17 [Blank.].
New Speaker: 10:17 Yes,
and I've just being on the phone to the, to the, there's a company head still
that she works for. She don't just work for the company. Head Enfield Council,
she has worked in partnership with Enfield Council before.
Speaker 1: 10:41 Since
2016 but the actual solicitor firm that she represents is Kirwans solicitor
firm.
New Speaker: 10:44 And
her thing is, um, executive director is Sonya Robins and I just spoke to them
on the phone less than an hour ago.
New Speaker: 10:56 [Blank.].
New Speaker: 10:57 Yeah,
I would like you to represent me and I would like you to go over my case papers
and over my evidence and that's a Litigation officer I think that would only be
fair on your party's behalf to sit down and go through my evidence with me. If
you think that there's no weight in my evidence after you have seen it and
there's no chance I will win the case then I think that'd be fair for you to
dismiss the proceedings maybe or advise me to change my plea but in the
circumstances and with the evidence that I have got and that we have not yet
gone over that then I don't think that it would be fair on your behalf to do
that to me.
New Speaker: 11:26 [inaudible].
New Speaker: 11:26 I
have the strongest case ever and I have already told you that I am not going to
cause any problems for your solicitor firm with the Council or with any other
person.
Speaker 2: 13:19 [inaudible].
New Speaker: 11:59 I
appreciate the time that you have given me and i hope
that you have a good day sir.
New Speaker: 11:59 End
of call.
New Speaker: 11:59
New Speaker: 11:59
New Speaker: 11:59
New Speaker: 11:59
New Speaker: 11:59
New Speaker: 11:59
New Speaker: 11:59
New Speaker: 13:27 right.
Okay. [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible]
Speaker 1: 21:20 yeah,
that's a struggle. [inaudible] let's talk about men in the world. Conditional
things I want to represent. Scare me. I'm next [inaudible]. I'm just telling
you what that said. Just like in the PIP. Keep on telling me no, you must. Yeah.
I'm Brian and [inaudible].
Speaker 2: 26:43 [inaudible]
Speaker 1: 26:50 [inaudible].
New Speaker: 26:50
New Speaker: 26:50
New Speaker: 26:50
New Speaker: 26:50
New Speaker: 26:50
New Speaker: 26:49 New
phone call to the court
New Speaker: 26:49
New Speaker: 26:49
New Speaker: 26:49
New Speaker: 26:49
Speaker 3: 27:01 Hello
is this Edmonton County Court?
New Speaker: 27:02 It
is Yes. How can I help?
New Speaker: 27:04 Basically,
I have a few questions to ask. I'll have a case number. Is it possible I can
give you the case number.
New Speaker: 27:08 Of
course.
New Speaker: 27:08 is
E.0.0.E.D.0.4.9.
New Speaker: 27:10 Ber
with us for one moment.
New Speaker: 27:10 Ok,
Thank you.
Speaker 4: 27:28 And
who am I speaking to please
Speaker 3: 27:29 Mr.
Simon Cordell.
New Speaker: 27:33 Hi
how can I help.
New Speaker: 27:33 Basically
I have a few queries. Basically I have the claimant , which is Enfield council
trying to put another injunction order against me though your courts. They've
put forth, this is the fourth application that they've put on me illegally and
they're holding me hostage in my house. Under the first Asbo.
New Speaker: 27:49 application,
which doesn't have no victims signatures at the bottom of it and also that it
um, all the timestamps are wrong in it. They're saying that I'm an IC1, male in
it. Then the nine, nine, nine callers are now, I'm riding seven years in my
house illegally being detained because of it. And I basically kept phoning up
and trying to get people to act reasonable like reasonable people under that
statutory duties and they and going through the complaints procedures and they
kept, they kept, um, they kept abusing their positions and avoiding
disciplinary action and avoiding releasing me from my home.
Speaker 3: 28:23 Now
because of this, they have continued the same company, head Enfield council
have put another three applications on me since a possession order which they
never had moved victims in its statements, either and then they put an
injunction order on me after that to cover that up and another [inaudible] and
the judge threw that out. Then they'd just put another in junction order on me
illegally emergency applications. But none of them will call the emergency
application in the court to get the, the missing signatures rectified and me
release from being illegally detained in my house on the first application that
they made in 2014 and now I don't think that the court has to, I've wrote a
response bundle. I've kept a diary every day of everything that's happened.
New Speaker: 29:02 Hm.
New Speaker: 29:02 and
I've kept all of my text messages for all my partners between me and my
partners because they have caused the sex scandal in mine and my partner's name
when we've never argued with each other and I've never had no problems with me and
so forth.
Speaker 3: 29:16 And
I've got all my medical notes and recordings of the clinic transcribed out I've
been calling the call centre like, I've just explained explaining what I've
been explaining to you. The nine, nine, nine call centre and they've been
calling me a black bastard down the phone and telling me I've been robbed. I've
transcribed all of these and put them into the recordings and speaking to all,
I've spoken to all the executive directors of all the other courts that they
accepted this case illegally in error of the law and I've also contacted I, I'm
at a stage now I want to go through the Supreme courts, but if this
application's being put on me again, illegally through this court by a judge
called Taylor judge Taylor. I would like to know what the judge Taylor surname
is and also I would like to be able to call them and call another meeting back
into the courthouse so that I can show him my response bundle and that I am
building my defence still and that this is taking me some time. It's taken me
over six months to build it so far and that I've needed an extension in time to
be able to serve my paperwork, my response,
Speaker 4: 30:17 Right
you have got a hearing coming up on the 5th of February
Speaker 3: 30:22 on
the 5th of February. The hearing is coming up, ok
Speaker 4: 30:24 on
the 5th of February so you can voice your opinion there to the Judge
Speaker 3: 30:29 Okay.
What is who is the Judge that actually um, allowed this to happen.
New Speaker: 30:33 Employment
Judge it’s an employment Judge Taylor that is his surname Taylor
Speaker 3: 30:38 that's
his surname and what was his first name?
New Speaker: 30:40 Hmm,
hmm.
New Speaker: 30:40 Right
let me find out if I can give you his first name just beer with me for one
moment
Speaker 4: 30:41 Thank
you.
New Speaker: 31:00 Hello,
New Speaker: 31:00 Hello.
New Speaker: 31:00 Yeah,
I am unable to give her first name just Employment Judge Taylor.
Speaker 3: 31:05 Okay.
I'm going to accept obviously that but under the law that I understand. Under
your stationery duties that you represent for the courts. Yeah. As a reasonable
person, I'm entitled to know any, any official persons under litigation cause
they should all be on a registry and I'm allowed to voice my opinion.
New Speaker: 31:23 Right.
New Speaker: 31:23 Underneath
there thing. So I'm quite surprised that you won't give me the judge who is
dealing with me and who.
New Speaker: 31:27 Yeah,
but I just asked my colleague but you can write in.
New Speaker: 31:27 ok.
Speaker 4: 31:30 And
say that you want the judges name and we can get that referred up to the judge
Speaker 3: 31:36 Okay.
I won't the judge's name oversly. I am entitled to
know.
New Speaker: 31:37 Hm,
hm.
New Speaker: 31:37 who's
dealing with me.
New Speaker: 31:39 Sir
that is fine.
New Speaker: 31:39 If
I wanted to have a babysitter or something looking after my kid, I wouldn't
just take their surname and these people are looking after me. I don't have
children. So I look after myself and I want to know the person that's dealing
with my life.
New Speaker: 31:50 Fine.
New Speaker: 31:50 That
first name,
New Speaker: 31:51 That's
fine but like I said you have got a hearing on the 5th.
New Speaker: 31:51 Okay.
New Speaker: 31:51 Of
February.
New Speaker: 31:51
New Speaker: 31:52 And
obviously if you want the known name, just send us an email.
New Speaker: 31:59 Okay,
New Speaker: 32:05 And
we can get that referral.
New Speaker: 32:05 What
time is the hearing on the 5th may I ask.
New Speaker: 32:05 Hold
on a second and just bear with me 2:00 O'clock.
New Speaker: 32:06 2:00
O'clock.
Speaker 3: 32:07 Hm,
hm.
New Speaker: 32:07 Okay.
Now this emergency applications has been put on me again. So now I'm being held
on this emergence application. Now the day, that I come back from my home.
Yeah. Now I've made a proper report in 2006 I asked the council for a um, noise
abatement notice. They sent me a special one from the civic centre. Now every
day in that diary I've been building, they put the diary, the table the wrong
way round, say the right and go skinny I have turned it round. I've done, I've
done a master's report, which is the highest grade I've done over 2 million
words in my report. Yeah. All my, all my problem solving statements at the
bottom all the potential causes, every email between me and every official
person that they have sent me, every phone call I've transcribed. I've spent
months doing it. Yeah. Now I'm, I'm obviously, they are in a lot of trouble.
Speaker 1: 32:49 For
what has happened and what them Judges have done illegally holding me in my
house. I don't think that the lower court has jurisdiction over this case and I
would like the case to be weighed straight away. The judge to oversee that he
doesn't have jurisdiction over the case for the Laws that are needed and send
it straight up to the higher court.
Speaker 3: 33:05 Otherwise,
I'm going to be going to the Supreme court myself. I'm going to prove everything.
The day that i got released, the day that they gave
me this Asbo, I'm sitting in my house and they started to.
New Speaker: 33:15 [Banging
in background].
New Speaker: 33:15 my
neighbours are attacking me in my house they are bang, bang. And now I have
recorded this every single day and you can hear me in my house explaining to
the people what they're doing is illegal to me. I'm having heart attacks in my
house. I'm writing to the Council explaining that
Speaker 1: 33:27 I
am having problems with my heart.
New Speaker: 33:28 That
I have been; and that this is not correct. So I don't understand how this court
will have the Jurisdiction to Taylor has not already understood that from
what's going on. Lemmy, Lemmy and that have built this Possession Order under three
applications under
New Speaker: 33:43 [inaudible].
Can I ask you a question? have they served you the paperwork?
New Speaker: 33:43 Basically
what initially. No. this is what did saved them. What initially happened is the
other day I was in my house and they come to my house again to get me out. They
wanted to get the report, the paperwork when they come in my house i have got cameras in every room the front room and my
kitchen and everything all on line yeah.
New Speaker: 34:02 so
they cannot come into my house and get me and i have
got a massive gate and dogs and everything to protect my house yeah, So they
can't get into my house to get this report.
New Speaker: 34:08 They
come in and they come to my house over some illegal pretence the other night
and nicked me again, yeah, for threats to kill yeah, saying that I've
threatened my neighbourhood. When my neighbours were attacking me and I phone
them up. I phoned them up I phoned up Nine, nine, nine and said look I am in my
house and can you hear my neighbours banging at me. Will you protect me and
then BT transferred me over to the Nine, nine, nine call operator and they're
on the phone. I'm recording all of this.
New Speaker: 34:30 Si
Note: [I never realized that I had left the recorder on]
New Speaker: 34:30 Like
I'm not recording our conversation now. That's the gossip ale honest truth. Yeah,
this is between us yeah,
New Speaker: 34:30
New Speaker: 34:32 Now
I basically, they keep attacking me in my house yeah and I never done nothing.
New Speaker: 34:38 I
never done no disease.
New Speaker: 34:40 they've
said that they have done this to cover over what Robert Taylor done.
New Speaker: 34:40 This
bloke called Robert Taylor.
New Speaker: 34:43 He
was the barrister for the first case. The Asbo that the council brought against
me. Now he'd done the same to somebody else a section assault if you write this
down just on a bit of paper for your own inquiries and your offices, Bristow
spot Light all one word Bristol spotlight.co.uk.
New Speaker: 34:59 Now
when you look at that there, and there's another bloke the same as me, that
this Robert Taylor was dealing with. Yeah.
New Speaker: 35:06 And
he'd done exactly the same to him with this Sally Gilchrist the Executive
Director of our country under Hue Gils Solicitor firm.
Speaker 1: 35:13 They
forged all of the paperwork and done the same to this other bloke as well and
caused a sex scandal in his name, they'd beat him up and done the same. No, I'd
be phoning them saying, this is out of order. I put in under the prosecution
the Crown Prosecution files in the right to a Fair Trial in the Right to a Fair
and Speedy Trial.
New Speaker: 35:26 I
served that to the judge and I said to the judge, um, look under I want, I'm
requesting MG2, MG3, MG4 MG5, MG6, MG6E and MG6E is any person's criminal
record that is dealing with my caseload. And they refuse to give this to me.
And this bloke was doing exactly the same thing.
New Speaker: 35:46 to
somebody else at the same time yeah, and they didn't pull him off and put
somebody else on his caseload, that is illegal what they have done, they have
got no victims signatures, all the time stamps to the call centres go backwards
in time, in the course. And in the paperwork they have opened up. Every paper
that they have found on the computer they have opened them up, which had been
in there for a year, which are the incidents, they were all good things and
edited them and then they wrote err he is a black battered. Brown boy on the
block they have scribbled all over it about my ethnics and then they used these
things once they've opened them and putting them into the application, the
judge, they couldn't get a judge to get me.
New Speaker: 36:23 with
the injunction order they served the Injunction outside of my front door and
never served it to me correctly yeah not this second one the first one they left
it outside.
New Speaker: 36:23 So
mum, I got my mum to come down and bring it to lost property. Edmonton She handed
it into the lost property and got a receipt for it yeah, all stamped Edmonton.
One blue folder found outside Simons door and was never served properly.
Speaker 1: 36:42 Now
all of a sudden that only had four victims in it. Saying that they got keep up overnight
yeah, that's what this is all about. and why I got seven years for people got keep
up overnight. Now I went to the, when I see the folder, I've been in my house
for a year prior working for Bliss Charity, I was building a mode constitution
and a CIC Association. I was working for Durant’s Park festival, Ponders End
Festival.
New Speaker: 37:01 I
had gone completely legit.
New Speaker: 37:01 so
they couldn't they wanted to pull me back, so they accused me of all the people
while I was on curfew for the first that year. Yeah, for another case that I
won, they threw all loads of there is six people i
there in their incidents. Now three of them. I know the people they are
associates that run off and done their own thing and left me on curfew while I
was in my house basically. And then that I have got to protect and then three
of them could be your children.
Speaker 1: 37:26 So
I went to my Facebook and then I copied the event profile pages, proving that I
never though these events. Now, I refused to give them to the police, because I
did not want to be a police informant and I don't do there lines of
investigation for them anyway, and I kept showing this Robert Taylor, who was
the Barrister that are in the picture of that Bristol spotlight, that I was
showing you about what was going on but i would not
give him the Facebook accounts.
New Speaker: 37:44 And
they kept doing it, Now I have got all the transcripts. Yeah they accepted all
the police officers. 15 coppers went to court and attended to be first-hand
evidence. Yeah none of them had any progress. They were all, they all hearsay
and they wrote, the case relies solely on hearsay yeah and in Highbury Court in
2007 the courts say it's against the law for anyone to have for a case to rely
on hearsay. So after all of this they started trying to get me out of the
country and done this to me and Shannon yeah, dirtied our names yeah and
started saying that we have got all diseases and shit like that they're looked
me in my house yeah.
New Speaker: 38:15 Sir.
New Speaker: 38:15 Yes.
New Speaker: 38:15 Can
i just stop you there are you [inaudible].
Speaker 1: 38:20 Yes,
that is correct. 100%.
New Speaker: 38:28 And
do you have all of your paperwork ready.
New Speaker: 38:28 Yes
madam yes i will do.
New Speaker: 38:28 Well
get all your paperwork ready for 2:)) O'clock.
New Speaker: 38:28 and
they never served me this injunction and that like
New Speaker: 38:30 Ok.
New Speaker: 38:30 When
I was in the cell.
New Speaker: 38:35 Okay.
You need to let you need to let the court you need to let the office know when
you come here for your hearing. You need to let them know that they have not
served the paperwork on you.
New Speaker: 38:35 Yes
that is correct I will do that I understand
New Speaker: 38:35 How
did you get this case number [She is trying to trick me into saying how i got served]
New Speaker: 38:38 because
what they've done is they tried to reopen another case because they got the
Injunction Order from before because they never severed it in time
New Speaker: 38:44 This
case number.
New Speaker: 38:44 This
case number, they basically, what they've done is when I got put into the
police cell they tried to bring some block from an independent company into my
police cell and tried to serve me the paperwork and I started to put my fingers
into my ears and run over to the camera.
New Speaker: 39:01 and
started screaming, saying, that this is against the law. you cannot serve me
while I am in my cell yeah, you can't do this it says that you have got to
serve me at my house or place of work it is illegal it illegal it's illegal and
I was screaming at the bloke to go away and the cops would not let him in my
cell yeah, so, he could not serve me and then he tried.
New Speaker: 39:05 So
how did you get the case number.
New Speaker: 39:05 Because
what they done is when I was in the police cell he throw the paperwork throw my
letter box.
New Speaker: 39:05 Err
so
New Speaker: 39:05
New Speaker: 39:05 So
he never served me directly.
New Speaker: 39:30 All
right, so what you do is tell the Judge that as well when you come on the 5th
of February.
New Speaker: 39:32 yeah.
I will do.
New Speaker: 39:32 And
in the meantime say all of that in an email.
New Speaker: 39:32 Saying
that they have to re serve me and that.
New Speaker: 39:32 thank
you.
New Speaker: 39:32 bye
New Speaker: 39:32 have
a good day madam.
New Speaker: 39:32 And
you to