Page 440 - Pages from Main Additional Emails Updated

This should cover it I hope as I really did nothing wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied to get my insurance cancelled
as she spoke to the police compound and they told her there was no tools.

The vehicle registration I was driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included on my insurance. So should
have shown on the database along with my car. However, none showed up as being insured on the MID database, this is what has
caused me all the problems with the police.

As already aware yes I was stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized.
I do have some of the some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the vehicle out of the compound for
the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up on the 16/11/2013.

I have the ones for the 08/04/2013, 29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 I just need to get the receipts for the other dates and
also something that shows they was all sized due to no insurance from the police compound.

As for the Data Subject Access Request, I am most grateful that this is being addressed. If I had known a fee was, needed I
would have paid that right away, but due to no one getting back to me about the ones that were put in, I did not know a fee was
needed.

Regards

Simon Cordell

From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com]
Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694

Dear Mr Cordell,

Unfortunately Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have picked this matter up.

The first order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case, can you confirm when the date has been set for the hearing
please? My thought is that we provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically confirms that you had a valid policy in force between
said dates and on what vehicles, this should satisfy the Courts but if they need anything else we will be happy to assist, just let me
know what you require.

I understand you were stopped several times and had vehicles seized, you are in the process of obtaining evidence of these vehicle
seizures and the costs incurred by you as a result for us to consider compensation. When you have gathered this please forward
the evidence to us as soon as possible.

There is also the matter of your Data Subject Access Request. I have spent some time today tracking down recorded calls and
various communications and hove notified our Data Protection Officer of your request. I can see that you have made a request,
any request should correctly be sent on for the attention of the Data Protection Officer along with a £10 fee. Your request was
addressed generally to KGM with no fee and it would appear not actioned. The underwriter dealing with your request should have
asked immediately for the fee payment and escalated your request accordingly. This was not done for which I must apologise, as a
result we will waive the fee requirement and I would confirm this is now in hand.

We have yet to issue a final response to your complaint and I would assure you we will do this as soon as we have received your
response to the above points.

439