Page 47 - tmp
P. 47

88,
               Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf

                                      IN THE WOOD GREEN CROWN COURT
                                                  Case No A2Q150064
                  IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL AGAINST AN ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR
                                                        ORDER
                                                    B E T W E E N :
                                               SIMON CORDELL -and-
                                                       Appellant
                            THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE METROPOLIS
                                                      Respondent
                                SKELETON ARGUMENT FOR THE RESPONDENT

               References to page numbers are in [square brackets], [AX] being the Appellant’s bundle and
               [RX] being
               the Respondent’s bundle
               45
               Listing; For appeal hearing, 22-24.02,16 for 3 days
               Issues: (I) whether the Appellant has acted in an anti-social manner
               (ii) whether an ASBO necessary Recommended
               pre-reading: For an Application for the ASBO [Rl-3]
               The ASBO made on 04.08.15 [R13]
               The statements of DC Elsmore, the OIC [R14-35]
               Statements of R’s witnesses [R36-66]
               A’s statements [A1-X5]
               Statements of A’s witnesses [A16-30, A258-272]
               INTRODUCTION
               (1) The Appellant is appealing against a decision made by the district judge at Highbury
               Corner Magistrates’ Court on 4 August 2015 pursuant to S.1 of the Crime and Disorder Act
               1998 (“the 1998 Act”) to make him subject to an anti-social behaviour order (ASBO) to last
               for 5 years.
               (2) The facts relied upon by the Respondent are set out in the bundle of evidence placed
               before the court and, in particular, the witness statements of the Respondent’s officers [R.14-
               35]. The Appellant has also provided a bundle for this appeal hearing [A],
               89,
               Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf
               Simon Cordell Skeleton Argument.pdf
               (3) The Respondent’s case is that the Appellant has been integrally involved in the
               organisation of raves in London, particularly Enfield, and/or the supply of sound equipment
               to those raves. The Respondent relies on each incident set out in the application notice to
               support his case [Rl-3]. 'The Respondent submits that it is necessary for an ASBO to be in
               place to protect the public from further anti-social acts, specifically the organisation of raves,
               done by the Appellant.
               (4) A chronology of events is appended to this Skeleton Argument.
               (5) LEGAL FRAMEWORK
               (6) Whilst the relevant provisions of the 1998 Act were repealed by the Anti-social
               Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014, s.21 of that Act provides that these proceedings are
               unaffected except that, on 23 March 2020, the Appellant’s ASBO will automatically become
               an Injunction under as if made under S.1 of that Act.


                                                                                              Page 45 of 139
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52