Page 383 - tmp

what the police officer said on that phone call to KGM. In addition, when KGM spoke to the manager
at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools, I think the reason for this is the
police officer committed perjury in the court.

That is why they asked me to get proof that my insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements
as to what the police officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, In addition, the facts
how KGM found out I had in fact done nothing wrong and my insurance should not be cancelled.

However, if you think a Letter of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be done I
would be very grateful, but could you include in the letter only reason this has come about is due to
what the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. In addition, this is the reason KGM
told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the insurance policy I had in force with
them.

This should cover it I hope as I really did nothing wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied
to get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound and they told her there was no
tools.

The vehicle registration I was driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included
on my insurance. So should have shown on the database along with my car. However, none showed
up as being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me all the problems with the police.

As already aware yes I was stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized.
I do have some of the some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the vehicle
out of the compound for the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up on the 16/11/2013.

I have the ones for the 08/04/2013, 29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 I just need to get the receipts
for the other dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to no insurance from the
police compound.

As for the Data Subject Access Request, I am most grateful that this is being addressed. If I had
known a fee was, needed I would have paid that right away, but due to no one getting back to me
about the ones that were put in, I did not know a fee was needed.

Regards

Simon Cordell

From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com]
Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694

Dear Mr Cordell,

Unfortunately Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have picked
this matter up.

The first order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case, can you confirm when the date
has been set for the hearing please? My thought is that we provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically
confirms that you had a valid policy in force between said dates and on what vehicles, this should
satisfy the Courts but if they need anything else we will be happy to assist, just let me know what you
require.
1361