Page 168 - tmp
P. 168

name was given, then it seemed to change to Mr Cordell saying he was homeless, but the police officer would
          have done checks of the name given, which I believe the note book proves my son give his correct name as
          there was no reason for him not to have done as he never done any thing wrong. and this would have been
          confirmed when the police officer done his police checks.

          There is also one other issue and that is when Mr Cordell asked for an inspector to be called due to what the
          police officer had said to the insurance company. Mr Cordell was telling the inspector that the police officer had
          lied to his insurance company about tools being in the vane, all it would have took was for the inspector to check
          the van at that time, he would have then seen something was really wrong as there was no tools and would have
          seen this, and this could have been addressed there and then without the need for my son to have been arrested.

          If there is anything you need for me please let me know.

          Regards

          Lorraine Cordell


          From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk]
          Sent: 30 January 2017 12:56
          To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
          Subject: RE: PC/6804/13

          Hello Ms Cordell,

          I hope this email finds you well.

          Have you had a chance to look at the document attached to my last email?

          Kind regards

          Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards |
          MetPhone 786675 | Telephone 0207 161 6675  | Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk
          Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR

          From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
          Sent: 23 January 2017 13:58
          To: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk>
          Subject: RE: PC/6804/13

          Dear Jamie Newman

          Yes I am dealing with on behalf of my son have been from the start. So if everything can be done via this email I
          would be grateful.

          I will look at the attached document today, but do believe you have had contact with Martin Jerkins and he
          confirms that the Police officer
          did not say about any tools or Mr Cordell going round doing odd jobs on that call. As the police officer did when
          he made the call to KGM.

          Regards

          Lorraine Cordell




          From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk]
          Sent: 23 January 2017 10:24
                                                    3146
   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173