Page 198 - 2. 2013 New 26-05-21 No Table

received any confirmation from the court. I forwarded a copy of my insurance policy to the court and
again this was ignored. The offence of no insurance was allegedly committed on
22nd July 2012.
I had a valid policy of insurance from
23rd March 2012
and this policy was valid until
22nd February 2013.
The company insuring me was Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder,
Mr. Simon Cordell and my policy number are L/WST/MTP/0192359. I have points on my licence
which I should not have. Can you please as a matter of urgency email me back on this matter so that I
can have a date so that the conviction can be set aside and my case heard in order that I can show the
court my insurance and the PLO can make the necessary enquiries. Once this has happened, I would
be grateful if the court could email the DVLA to advise them that the points have been issued in error
and the fine be set aside also. This matter is urgent and is dragging on. I cannot resolve this matter
until the case is listed before either a District Judge or Magistrates so I would appreciate your
cooperation. I am very disappointed that you have ignored all my emails. This is causing me stress.
Can you now please resolve this legal mater by listing the case for an application to set aside the
conviction?
I can then forward my documents to the relevant prosecuting authority.
I await hearing from you in relation to this matter and I thank you in advance for your anticipated
co=operation in this matter.
53

5
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
14 JOSEPHINE Ward Re_ FW_ Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and re-
open t2
/ Page Numbers: 54,55,56,57
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 May 2013 17:46
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Re: FW: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen the case
Lorraine
There are many ways to skin a cat. Having thought about Simon's other case it may be better to wait
until the hearing as we may be able to make representation to the prosecutor on the day in question
that Simon did have a valid insurance policy and the data base could not be accessed. There were no
warning markers re the van. The whole reason for the stop of the vehicle had to be ascertained as why
was he stopped in the first place, if not for no insurance then for what?
I can refer them to the case re possession of the bladed article. Basically, I will argue that but for his
van being seized for no insurance for which he was not guilty and could have brought his insurance to
the station on a producer then the public order offence would not have been committed. We will play
it by ear, I think.
Regards
Josephine
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
I think it was due to your email and the wording lol - lol
Lorraine
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 May 2013 14:32
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Re: FW: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen the case
Hi Lorraine
At least progress is now being made. Keep me posted and if you need any further help then please do
not hesitate to contact me on email / mobile.
Kind regards