Page 280 - 2. 2013 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 280

Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for application to clarify bail conditions and vary bail conditions
               on Tuesday
               16th July 2013
               Dear Sir or Madam
               We act on behalf of our above-named client under the terms of a legal representation order. Our
               client's matter was listed at Woolwich Crown Court for a preliminary hearing and an application to
               vary our client's bail conditions. The Learned Judge on that occasion refused to deal with the
               application to vary bail and raised issues regarding why the surety was not present. He removed the
               surety requirement and our understanding is that our client was admitted to bail on the same terms as
               before. A number of issues have now arisen as a result of this. Serco attended to insert an electronic
               tag, and this was never a condition of our client's bail when he was granted bail by Woolwich Crown
               Court but a curfew with a doorstep condition was imposed. Our client explained this to Serco who
               left. We clarified that this information was accurate by reviewing the advocate's attendance note from
               10th July
               and also receiving verbal confirmation from Mr Lemosa to further verify this. When our client went to
               report to Edmonton Police Station in compliance with his bail conditions, he was arrested for
               breaching his bail in that he refused Serco entry to install the electronic monitoring equipment. This
               was on
               13th July 2013
               Fortunately, our client was able to produce a copy of the bail notice from Woolwich Crown Court and
               also a copy of the advocate's court attendance notes who attended on
               13th July 2013
               He was released.
               96
               Ms Cordell contacted Serco and advise Jo badge number 3072 of this development and Serco will
               now wait until
               Tuesday 16th July 2013
               to receive clarification from the court. Can you please list this case tomorrow?
               16th July 2013
               in order that matters can be clarified. We thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter and
               we await clarification of this.
               Yours faithfully
               MICHAEL CARROLL & CO.

               4
               The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
               40 JOSEPHINE Ward Photos as promised
               / Page Numbers: 97
               From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
               Sent: 12 June 2014 18:43
               To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth
               Subject: Photos as promised
               Attachments: Simon Cordell crime scene photos.pdf
               Dear Lorraine & Simon
               Please see attached the crime scene photographs. They do not add anything to the case. The attached
               statements however confirm that the police were aware that there were squatters in the premises, and
               this contradicts the statement of the Inspector. I think that a Saturday office appointment will be better
               at my office. I will confirm the time on Saturday morning as I have another two clients attending also.
               I am on a legal visit in the morning and then I have a conference at Wood Green Crown Court.
               Regards
               Josephine

               5
               The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
               41 Lorraine Cordell_RE_ Advance information on Simon's case
   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285