Page 288 - 2. 2013 New 26-05-21 No Table

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
43 Lorraine Cordell_RE_ Advance information on Simon's case_ (2)
/ Page Numbers: 102,103,104
From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 16 July 2013 18:05
To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
Subject: RE: Advance information on Simon's case
Attachments: Woolwich Bail.jpg
Hi Jose
Look really sorry to bother you on holiday, I tried to get Michael to deal with this, but he seemed to
get very upset. Today we went to Woolwich crown court; the judge did not leave the curfew as you
said they may not have when we last talked. But the bail conditions were sorted as far as I was aware,
curfew with doorstep as before. I even got the guy that was sent to get the bail printed out for me
which I will add to this email. I later today called Serco to make sure the tag had been lifted but again
they told me the court had again said he was on tag, so I called the court and I got a rude lady who
said well that’s the order I have in front of me when I told her what I had she then replied that well
you need to get your solicitors to re list it. I told her that was why it was listed for today, but she was
still being rude and unhelpful. After I called the office and talked to someone and they called the guy
that come to court for Simon, he also told your office it was doorstep. I was told that due to us having
the letter from the court that Simon should not let the tag go on. Worried this was when I called
Michael to be honest, he did not seem to care and said something I was not happy with. He said this
was your case and he was fucking going to email you to find out what the fuck was going on. I told
him not to that you were on holiday he said that does not matter you and your husband are not getting
on and you would be happy for the email. I am not hiding the way in which Michael talked to me in
fact he was just trying to say tell Simon to put the tag on as it did not matter. And really, I think he
was thinking that it was a tag from the start as I sure he was not hearing me right. Should I tell Simon
to put the Tag on or not as far as Simon said when I told him what Woolwich had done, he said he
was not going to let them put the tag on this is causing me so much headache. And I know they will
just arrest him like they tried to do the other day. So, I don’t know what to do for the best. But I am
really not happy how Michael talked to me. I am sorry to have to email you on holiday this should be
some time to enjoy yourself and you do need that with the hours you do.
Lorraine
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 July 2013 17:12
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: RE: Advance information on Simon's case
103,
Simons case listed tomorrow for bail clarification.
On Jul 15, 2013 12:58 PM,
Lorraine Cordell
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
Jose
As for the Q and A records from PC Almy there is a lot he has lied about. Simon did say to him that
he brought a job lot of 5 chairs and 5 gazebos this is a fact. But he also said the Gazebo that was in his
garden was brought from focus along with another thing he got for his kitchen. Also, none of the PC
have said that me and Sheila was at the address we got there just after Simon let the police in this
should have been noted and has not by any officer. I know they are meant to ask and note anyone that
comes to the address when they are there. As for the Nokia phone I was the one that told the police I
got it from Tesco for Simon. Also, no colleagues secured the dog Simons put the dog out before he let
the police in. Also if you look at PC Almy statement where he said Simon was going to set the dog on
them, then look at PC golden you see that both are saying something else if it was the case Simon had
said he was going to set the dog on them it would have been in both statements. As should have been
all the Q and A from PC Almy statements why is it the case all this is only listed on 1 statement when
all officers should have heard what was said. We also have the receipt from the guy at the party, I