Page 247 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk'
Subject: Re: Simon Cordell
Attachments: Appeal-Case-Driving-Tools-26-11-2014.pdf
S Cordell 020215.pdf.
MT Underwriting_ FW_ MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ.pdf
s Cordell call from police 141113.wma.
26_11_2013_13_53-Kelly-Tiller-Kelly call to compound.wav
Dear Debbie Barnett
Thank you for taking the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Could
you please also confirm by email that you have this email.
As explained, there have been a number of issues with my son Simon Cordell DOB:
26/01/1981.
The issues are one of not being insured. When in fact he was.
There was a case heard on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my son
Simon Cordell was found guilty. Of using his vehicle for business purposes.
This was only the case due to the police officer lying. Not just to KGM who my son was
insured with, but in his statement of facts, and also on oath to the judge and CPS.
The case is such that on the day my son was stopped the police office made a call to KGM
the police office told KGM that my son Simon Cordell had lots of tools in his van and was
doing odd jobs. Under my son insurance this would not have covered him, and the police
officer would have known this already as my son had given the police officer his policy at the
side of the road.
My son was arrested and taken to the police station. Due to him refusing to sign the seizer
notice and telling the police officer he was lying and to arrest him.
My sons Van registration CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound,
with no tools in there.
The police office when wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call but
with something totally incorrect information. The judge asked the police office at court about
the tools as he saw emails from KGM the police office told the judge he knew nothing about
any tools.
The police officer I believed new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls was
already being put into the police about complaints. So changed his story in his statement.
The facts are that there are audio tapes of what the police officer said to KGM, and also the
call that was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all calls.
I have both of the audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a
manager sent to Kelly Tiller at KGM.
How can a police officer act in such a manner. I really do not understand why he did this.
As also said on the phone there is a number of summons my son has not had regarding the
other stops from police, these case he have gone to court without him knowing and he been
found guilty when he did not even know there was a case in court.
I have sent many emails to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to the
court. 2 case we had to do statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for Bromley. The
Willesden one seems to have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing
again he was found guilty but they put this case under a new case number looking at the letter
so all the documents that were sent before was not with the court file I would have through.
But with both statutory declarations we added a copy of his insurance.
I have been trying for some time to get all of this put together so it can all be addresses and so
far, nothing has been done with all the emails I have sent to the court. We also asked at court
when we went to Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, but nothing was done. Could you please tell
us where we can sort this out about getting all the other cases addressed without the need to