Page 332 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

• Disrepair!
• The 2nd Curfew for the Asbo Interim Order Condition’s got granted in Error!
• The banging Continued!

1
• The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
451. Josephine Ward Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v /
Page Numbers: 1578
Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius!

2
• The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
452. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v /
Page Numbers: 1579,1580
Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius!

--

1
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
451. Josephine Ward Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v
/ Page Numbers: 1578,
From: Josephine Ward [josie@michaelcarrollandco.com]
Sent: 08 February 2015 19:02
To: Peter.Wood@canopius.com
andrew.austin@canopius.com
Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th
March
2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court
Dear Mr Wood
I have been instructed by Mr Simon Paul Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell to assist in the
appeal against conviction that is due to be heard at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court on
5th March 2015 at 10am. Miss Cordell has played two recordings that she received from
KGM which are pertinent to the appeal but at present as the telephone recordings have not
been produced as an exhibit by KGM they will not be admissible at court. Can you therefore
please write a section 9 statement confirming that:
(a) all recording equipment was working correctly
(b) KGM produced two recordings at the request of Ms Lorraine Cordell
(c) Confirmation that the recording of S Cordell call from police 141113 Recording was
provided by
KGM from their recorded calls and is authentic
(d) Confirmation that the recording between the Car Pound and Kelly Tiller was also
provided from the KGM recorded calls and is authentic If we are in possession of a section 9
statement producing the recordings then we will not have to apply to the court for a Third
Party Summons to compel an employee from KGM to attend to produce the recordings. This
would be a complete waste of your time when all we require is a section 9 attesting to the
recordings being retrieved from the system and exhibited as two separate recordings. If you
require assistance with drafting a section 9 statement, then we would be happy to draft it and