Page 138 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

Sent: 28 February 2017 11:36
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
3103,
Subject: RE: Subject Access Request
Dear Miss Cordell
Please find the attached letters with regards to my phone call and your email below. This is
not a refusal, as explained, Subject Access Request have to be specific request. The system
does not just work by searching on names as you have expressed. I await each redefined
request. The application has been stopped until I receive your redefined requests.
Yours sincerely
Abigail Akano | Privacy Assistant |Strategy & Insight |Strategy & Governance| METHQ |
Metropolitan Police
Service
Protective Marking: Not Protectively Marked
Not Suitable for Publication:
Recipients of this email should be aware that all communications within and to and from the
Metropolitan Police
Service are subject to consideration for release under the Data Protection Act, Freedom of
Information Act and
Environmental Information Regulations. The MPS will consider information for release
unless there is valid and
proportionate public interest |reasons not to, therefore, sensitive information not for public
disclosure must be
highlighted as such. Further advice can be obtained from the Information Rights Unit ‐
783500.
From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 27 February 2017 18:44
To: SAR Mailbox ‐ Online Applications <SARonlineapplications@met.pnn.police.uk>
Subject: RE: Subject Access Request
To Whom It May Concern:
I got a phone call today from someone dealing with the 4 subject access requests that were
submitted for
• Mr. Simon Cordell: (submitted on the 07/02/2017)
• Mr. Tyrone Benjamin: (submitted on the 08/02/2017)
• Miss Deon Benjamin: (submitted on the 08/02/2017)
• Miss Lorraine Cordell: (submitted on the 08/02/2017)
I was told that a letter was going to be sent out stating that the way in which I have filed the
subject access
request is not by dates and that dates would be needed to complete the requests. I said to the
lady how can we give you dates there is to many of them, far too many for us to remember as
this is going back over 23 years of data we have requested, as we want all data that is held
about us by police. This is when the lady said that she will send me a letter stating I had to
update my request. Could the lady please be asked who called me today if this letter can be
sent via my email. I have spoken to the ICO explained what has been said and even the lady
cannot believe I am being asked to supply 23 years of dates, and can it also be confirmed if
this is a refusal of the 4 subject access request that have been submitted. We want to move
this forward, and we have the right to the information that is being held on us, all of it, dates
should not be needed as we would like all information.
3104,3105,