Page 228 - 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table All

I Miss Lorraine Cordell am writing this letter to say that I do object to pay the sum of
£785.70 for preparing the Acknowledgment of Service to be paid by the claimant to the
defendant. I confirm that I was also the person who filed the application for the claimant in
order to get justice within this case. The judge who stated that there was no merit within the
case I believe is wrong. I do understand that when the judge made his decision there was little
evidence supplied by us. I am not a lawyer and upon receiving the Metropolitan police
response to the application I realised my mistake when filing the application. I did make calls
to the High Court to explain the error in the hope that they would be able to help me as they
had done before, I stated that I would need more time to submit the evidence to the court that
I would have to try and get legal help. The lady I spoke to stated that I could take my time in
submitting the evidence, so I did not know I was on a time limit until we’d received the letter
from the court.
2226
Between:
THE QUEEN
ON THE APPLICATION OF
SIMON CORDELL
CLAIMANT
- AND-
THE COMMISSIONER OF THE POLICE OF THE METROPOLIS
DEFENDANT
THE COMMISSIONER OF THE POLICE OF THE METROPOLIS
INTERESTED
PARTY
207,
Letter to high court C0 2171 2017.pdf
At this time the skeleton argument I was writing comprises of over 90 pages with regard to
the errors that have occurred within this whole case since it started in 2014. This would be
many more pages once completed.
The claimant and his family only ever wanted justice and the truth, the UK justice system is
supposed to be one of the best within the world but in this case it has failed to see the truth,
the police hold information on their systems which proves my son's innocence and when
asked to provide this evidence they withheld it though we asked many times since 2014, not
one judge has ordered the police to hand over this information, then the appeal judge
removing my sons legal representation and stating he can do the case himself, How was a
person with mental health problems, learning difficulties, health problems meant to have
coped with dealing with the appeal himself, nothing was put in place by the judge to address
this, a few days prior to the appeal hearing I managed to find a solicitor willing to take the
case on for the appeal, on 17 January 2017 the judge refused to allow the new solicitors a
short adjournment which would have enabled the new solicitors to go over all the bundles,
speak to the client which they had not done, the judge just dismissed it told them they had to
be ready by the next morning if they could not be ready then my son would have to deal with
the case himself, how is this justice, there is many other factors in this case that was incorrect
and breached human rights.
The claimant as the courts was aware has mental health issues, he also has learning
difficulties, and other health issues. The claimant receives benefits every two weeks of the
sum of £201.30, which is £100.65 per week; this money has to cover all of his bills, water
rates, 19.5% council tax shortfall, electric, gas, £5 a week for him to have a phone for
emergencies, his food, hygiene items, and any other items to support living. I do not