Page 260 - tmp

On the 30/01/2015 my mother got by email from KGM Peter Wood the audio files for the 14/11/2013 and the 26/11/2013, an
email that was sent from the police compound to Kelly Tiller, and a Letter of Indemnity. The Letter of Indemnity had to be
corrected as my mother wanted all the facts covered correctly the new Letter of Indemnity was sent on the 02/02/1015 by
Peter Wood. We got the full subject access request from KGM at a later date. And on the 09/01/2015 we got a witness
statement from Peter Wood.
I had to get a barrister also as this time I did not want anything to go wrong and for me to be found guilty again when I had done
nothing wrong.
The appeal hearing was on the 05/03/2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court where PC Geoghegan again lied to the judge
in court. But this time we had the Audio and a barrister. The judge was not happy with what PC Geoghegan did, it was also
noted by the court that there was no note book, PC Geoghegan statement was not correct and was only a copy and not dated
and also the seizer ticket had been lost. The judge ordered the police officer out of his court room and not to leave the court
building.

I won my appeal Upon Thames Crown Court on the 05/03/2015, this case has caused me a lot of problems that took over 1 year
to address and correct due to what the PC Geoghegan did that day. He should never had lied and put me under the stress
this case has caused me, if KGM did not record the phone calls I could be on a ban from driving and points on my license
and had a fine to deal with this should never had happened.

There are a number of issues I wish to be addressed for my complaint as follows:
• Areas of complaint.

PC G blatantly lied to the insurance company resulting in his van being seized with a cost of £190.00 to get it out of the police
compound and having to go up and down the compound to proof to his insurance he did not have any tools in the van, his
insurance company was going to cancel his insurance policy that a lot of money had been paid PC G tried to void his
insurance which I believe is corrupt and improper practice of any police officer.

Unlawful seizure of van which cost £190.00 to get it out.
Unlawful arrest I should never have been arrested as I had not done anything wrong I believe this is Unlawful Imprisonment as
he used false information knowing it to be false to arrest me.
Forced to sign a ticket for 6 penalty points on driving license and £300 fine, on top of this I was later found guilty in a court and
banned from driving I believe over a £700.00 fine and points on his driving license all because PC G lied.
The inspector that came to road side due to my son asking did not do his job as if he did he would have seen there were in fact
no tools in the van and this issue could have then been addressed. But the inspector failed in his duties to do his job, as he
only wanted to hear what PC G had to say and not the real facts of the case about what his PC G did.
PC G blatantly lied in his statement he wrote about the events of that day he knew what he had told the insurance company yet
failed to put this in his statement as he new he had blatantly lied this is not a thing he could have forgot to add in his
statement a few hours after the fact when he was meant to have written the statement, which he later used in court knowing
they were not true facts.
I have never seen PC G notebook but do believe he wrote in a book at the roadside. I would like a copy of his notebook where
he recorded the name and information when he spoke to my insurance KGM.
PC G blatantly lied in the magistrate's court to the judge with the intention of gaining a conviction and perverting the Course of
Justice regarding contents of the van and also Perjury, which Simon was then found guilty, banned from driving, fined and
points added to his license.

PC G blatantly lied in the Crown court to the judge at the appeal hearing with the intention of keeping the conviction the
magistrate's court judge had passed, and perverting the Course of Justice, and also Perjury but was found out due to us
having the audio from KGM which in fact showed the judge what the police officer had done; my son won his appeal due
to this.

No one recorded a formal complaint at the time of the original incident when Simon waited at the police station and filed one
after he was arrested and released from the police station.

Signed Witnessed By
252