Page 53 - tmp

the matter involved, the court should be satisfied to the criminal standard of proof that a
defendant had acted in an anti-social manner before making such an order; and that,
accordingly, in rile first case the appropriate standard of proof had been applied, and since the
second case was not a “criminal cause or matter” the House had no jurisdiction to hear the
appeal under section 1 of the 1960 Act (post, paras 22, 2627, 30, 33-35, 36, 37, 39-40, 5H 55-
5h, 64, 67, 68, 74, 76-77, 81-84, 94-98, 102103, 105-106, 108, 111, 112, 11 3-117).
(22) Dicta of Lord Atkin in Proprietary Articles Trade Association v Attorney General for
Canada [1.931] AC 310, 324,
(23) PC, of Lord Bingham of Cornhili CJ in Customs and Excise Comrs v City of London
Magistrates' Court [2000] 1 WLR 2020, 2025,
(24) DC, B 1 > Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary [2001] 1 WLR 340,
DC, S v Miller 2001 SC 977 and
(25) Gough v Chief Constable of Derbyshire Constabulary [2002] QB 1213, CA applied.
Decision of the Court of Appeal [2001] EWCA Civ 281; [2001] 1. WLR 1084; [2001] 4 All
ER 264 affirmed.
The following cases are referred to in the opinions of their Lordships.
Adolf v Austria (1982) 4 EHRR 313
Albert and Le Compte v Belgium (1983)5 EHRR 533 ^
Amand v Home Secretary 1943 | AC 147; [1942] 2 All ER 381, HL(E)
B v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary [200 t] I WLR 340; [2001] 1 All
ER 562, DC
B endenoun v France (19 9 4) 18 EHRR 5 4
Bcnham v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 293
Brown v Stott (2003] t AC 68 r; [1001] 2 WLR 817; [2001] 2 All ER 97,
PC Cons tanda v M 19 9 7 S C 217
Customs and Excise Comrs v City of London Magistrates’ Court [2000] 1 WLR Z020;
120001 4 All ER 763,
DC Deweer u Belgium (1980) 2 EHRR 439
Dumbo Beheer BV v The Netherlands (1993) 18 EHRR 213
Doorson v The Netherlands (1996)22 EHRR 3 30 Engel t/
The Netherlands (No 1) (1976) > EHRR 647
Garyfallou AEBE v Greece (1997) 28 EHRR 344
Gough v Chief Constable of the Derbyshire Constabulary [2001 j EWITC Admin 554;
[2002] QB 459; [2001] 3 WLR T392; [2001] 4 All ER 289, DC; [2002] EWCA Civ 351;
12002] QB tzr 3; (2002] 3 WLR 289; [2002] 2 All ER 985,
CA Guzzardi v Italy (1980) 3 EHRR 3 3 3
H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof), hi re [ 1996] AC 563; (1996] 2 WLR 8; [
1996] 1 All ER 1, HI. (E)
Han v Customs and Excise Comrs {200:] EWCA Civ 1040; [2001] 1 WLR 2253; [2001] 4
All ER 687, CA
Kostovskt v The Netherlands (5989) 12 EHRR 434
Lauko v Slovakia (1998) 33 EHRR 994
98,
Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf
[2003] I AC
51
R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Ct (HL(E)
Lutz v Germany (1987) Ro EHRR 181
M v Italy (1991) 70 DR 59
McFeeley v United Kingdom (1980) 3 EHRR 161

Page 51 of 139