Page 322 - tmp

From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk
Sent: 15 December 2015 08:32
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: RE: complaint
Morning Lorraine,

A full report covering all areas of complaint has been compiled. The Chief Inspector in Lambeth will review the full
report and make a decision on what action or sanction is most appropriate against the officer.

Once his decision has been made I will notify you and a further letter will be sent which includes details regarding
your right to appeal should you not agree with the outcome.

I appreciate the concerns you have raised but will now need to wait for the Chief Inspectors final decision before I
can provide you with a full copy of the report that will explain why certain decisions were reached.

Many thanks

Jeanette

Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of
Professional Standards |

MetPhone 782253 | Telephone 020 7161 2253 | | Fax 020 7161 6798 |Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk
Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR

From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 14 December 2015 12:59
To: Reilly Jeanette ­ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards
Subject: RE: complaint

Dear Jeanette

Thank you for the reply to the complaint.

As you have found one of the aspect of the complaint that PC Geoghegan lied to Simon Insurance is a
breach then does this mean that anything that happened after that fact was unlawful?

As this caused a huge impact on Simon life after that lie happened, he was then arrested due to the lie,
had his van impounded to the lie, and then was found guilty at the lower court and then had to appeal to
prove he was innocent. His insurance company was going to close his insurance down and we had to
prove to them there were no tools in his van and in fact the police officer had lied.

I do not fully understand the one aspect you have said as that one aspect had a lot to do with what
happened after. PC Geoghegan even admits in the crown court he had not searched the van.

Could you please explain to me what this one aspect means?

Regards

Lorraine

2300