Page 31 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

saying that, the statement from Nikki Diamond will follow after the Insurance Company
discloses the claims made by Mr Patel, whether voluntarily or by Third Party disclosure. I do
feel this statement is 100% needed sooner not later as once this is shown to the crown I sure
they will rethink their case on me. As I feel at this time this is an unfair trail due to how Mr
Patel has used my case to be able to manipulate his insurance claim due to what has already
been discussed with Trevor Allaway. And this is a clear beach in my human rights to have a
fair trial. Also, on the
19/01/2013
when the application went into the court a bail application was meant to have been done at
the same time for my bail conditions over the holidays that where upcoming. For some reason
the bail application was not heard so you relisted this for
23/12/2013
to be heard by the court, you sent a text to my mum after you found out the outcome of this
bail application in which you said I was on an electric tag to my mum address, and that the
curfew was not lifted that Serco would come to my mums address to install the tag there. I
got very upset with hearing this as I for one reason I was never on an electric tag for this case
from the start of it. I did try and call you and I got no reply so I called the court explained to
the court the issues I had and was
457,
advised to call my solicitor and ask them to relist the case for the
24/12/2013
this would need to be done within the next 20 mins. I then called the office and explained this
to someone in the office and was told I would get a call back. I did not get a call back but at
around 21.47 that evening you texted my mum saying that Simon needed to be at Woolwich
crown court at 09.45 on the
24/12/2013
On the
24/12/2013
I went to court and my mum come with me, when we got there, we were told the case was not
listed before 11am. So we waited at the court at around 10.50 as a barrister had not turned up
for me my mum texted for to ask the name of the barrister that would be coming that we were
outside court 7 waiting, there was no reply to this text so at around 11.10 I made a call to the
office and spoke to someone there that told me a barrister would not be attending, I was really
upset with this but what could I say. I then saw the usher of the court and told her what was
going on, she said why had the solicitors told me to come here and yet new there would not
be a barrister and not tell me this beforehand, she told me she would talk to the crown who
was in the court room and explain to him what was going on and then let me know what
could be done. About 5 mins later she came out of the court room and told me that the crown
was going to call it on and see what could be done. It was called into court and when the
judge heard I did not have a barrister she asked the clerk of the court to call the office and see
what was going on, which the clerk on the court did, when she got off the phone, she told the
judge no one was coming to the court for me. I stood up and tried to explain to the judge what
had gone on. My mum at this asked the judge if she could explain it and the judge said yes to
come forward, she could hear what my mum was saying. My mum explained to the judge
about the
19/12/2013
and the
23/12/2013
the judge was at lose of what could be done as the rule that had been made on the
23/01/2014