Page 334 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Gazebo Case!

3
• The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
288. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (14) /
Page Numbers: 807,808
Gazebo Case!

4
• The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
289. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (13) /
Page Numbers: 809,810
Gazebo Case!

--

1
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
286. JOSEPHINE Ward _Re_ Regina v_ (11)
/ Page Numbers: 803,804,805,
Sent: 07 April 2014 14:29
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court 8th April 2014
Lorraine
The previous conviction discrepancies will be highlighted counsel to counsel between the
prosecution and the defence. Tactically we have to withhold certain information in particular
the email from the council. I have referred to the noise abatement officer attending and
alluded to police also being in attendance. The CPS is the organisation that makes the
decision on continuing the prosecution and it the police are failing to investigate and we
provide written representations with evidence in support then the prosecution may review on
the grounds that there is no realistic prospect of conviction. This is the most sensible
approach. As advised earlier once my headache clears, I will be drafting detailed
representations with a view to the CPS reviewing the prosecution in this case.
Regards
Josephine
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:53 PM,
Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Josey
Sorry to hear you are ill I hope you feel better soon. I notice that nothing is in there for the
bail application for the PNC and the failing to surrender that should not be on his record.
Which he does have bail condition set for failing to surrender. And can the issues about his
PNC be given in court tomorrow without it being in the bail application as I do feel the judge
should be told about these errors on Simon record as there is also more than one error and
these did have a deciding factor towards his bail condition in this case. And are we showing
the court the email from the council which does show the police was aware of the party
before
04/05/2013
and that it was being squatted before Simon had even attended the building?
I was thinking that all this information would have been needed to show the judge how bad
this case really is. Will it be Jemi that will attend court tomorrow?