Page 337 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

J.akinolugbade@nexuschambers.com
Dear Sir or Madam
We refer to the above matter. This case was last mentioned in court on
18th March 2014
and on that occasion the Learned Judge made a number of directions. Statements and
invoices regarding the repair of the wall to be served by
21st March 2014
not served Statements from council to be served by
29th March 2014
not Served We attach a copy of the insurance file that we received from Mr Patel's insurance
company and note will no doubt be taken of the dates of the previous break ins and the
damage caused on previous dates prior to
May 2013
You will also no doubt note that there were no invoices submitted for any repairs during that
period of time and also the delay in the Patel's responding to the insurance claim. It has
always been our client's case that the damage caused to the wall and inside the building had
already been committed before he hired out his sound system for the private party. Our client
has always disputed causing the damage or having any knowledge as to how this damage was
caused. We further raise that other suspects forensically linked to the earlier offences were
released with no further action been taken against them. Mr Cordell has always maintained
that police officers
808,
attended with the noise abatement officers but we are yet to be provided with the officer’s
contact details or indeed the reason for their attendance. Clearly the issue is why did the
Police allow a party to go ahead if persons present were damaging a wall and removing
property. Mr Cordell feels like he is being singled out and made a scapegoat in this case. He
denies involvement in the burglary and this allegation is having an adverse effect not only on
his business but also on his mental health. We attach a copy of a letter confirming his medical
diagnosis from his GP. We respectfully request that the curfew condition be removed in its
entirety as the curfew of having an adverse effect on Mr Cordell's mental wellbeing. We
request that the bail variation be addressed tomorrow at the pretrial
review hearing. Please confirm the listing at your earliest convenience.
Yours faithfully
MICHAEL CARROLL & CO.

4
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
289. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (13)
/ Page Numbers: 809,810,
From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 07 April 2014 19:05
To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court
08th April 2014
Hi Josey
Hope you are feeling better Is there an update as to if Simon needs to be at court tomorrow
and what time court is and if it will be Jemi?
Lorraine
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 April 2014 14:29