Page 47 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

against Simon and have done so more than once so I do feel this does needs addressing and
not left any longer.
Lorraine
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 February 2014 20:21
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Request for mobile telephone number
471,
Lorraine
I have lost all my telephone contacts as my smart phone has died. Can you please email me
your telephone number and Tyrone's please?
I remember your old number 07961 833 021 but cannot remember the other one or your
house number. I will hopefully list the case next week. Can you confirm the new Solicitor
details at your earliest convenience? I have also asked Jemi he can still do the case, but you
will probably have to tell the new solicitors that he is your preferred barrister. If you give
them my contact details, I can email over all the information etc.
Regards
Josephine

3
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
11 Feb 2014 at
/ Page Numbers: 472,473,474,475,
Enterprise Enfield News
From: Sue King (sking@enterpriseenfield.org)
To: re_wired@ymail.com
Date: Tuesday, 11 February 2014, 19:27 GMT
473,
“Information”
474,
“Information”
475,
“Information”

Si Note:
1

2

3

Disrepair!
The level of service provided by the Enfield Home and the Enfield Council departments
when I deal with them is terrible, and in my case, I get disadvantage because of the neglect
and. Intentional infliction of emotional distress that I get opposed towards by their staff! It is
truly tragic that the Enfield Councils and the Enfield Homes inclusive of the Metropolitans
constabulary left the occupiers of 117 Burncroft Avenue without any form of support in
regards to their Child's protection when I notified them of my concerns and video evidence of
the legal guardians consecutive while amoral behaviour of criminal attempts, as for the child
protection Act 1989 states that in section 27 of that act it requires all local authority as a must