Page 52 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

to at least have representation from a barrister. The majority of the work has been done on
this case and the only outstanding issues are as follows:
1. Disclosure from Insurance company
2. Disclosure requests in the defence case statement
3. Bad character skeleton argument to oppose Jemi will draft this as he will be arguing to
exclude the bad character. In relation to 1 and 2 above the items disclosed will assist with
cross examining witnesses. I have forwarded emails sent to the CPS, Woolwich Crown Court
and also to Mr Trevor Allaway. If you have any further questions, then please do not hesitate
to email me. I will still assist you with the preparation of the defence until legal
representation is revoked or transferred.
Regards
Josephine

3
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
204. JOSEPHINE Ward _Re_ Regina v_ (7)
/ Page Numbers: 478,479,480,
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 February 2014 15:04
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on
Hi Lorraine
I have just returned from lunch. Tell Simon that is fine. I do not want to fall out with either
him or you. He is hard work but I am still willing to represent him.
Regards
Josephine
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Josey
Thank you for the update I understand now as to the section 35. Simon has just got here as he
is due to have a meeting at 3pm today with a next solicitor; he has read the emails and asked
me to write this to you. If you are still willing represent him then he is fine with this, as he
was only upset due to him believing things was not being done in time and him believing this
would impact his life for longer. As he said the other day, he is sorry for the disagreement
that happened on the phone. If you could let him know how you feel about this before 14.30,
he would be grateful.
Simon / Lorraine
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 February 2014 12:17
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on
Hi Lorraine
Trevor Allaway has indicated that he will view a section 35 request favourably. If he agrees
that we satisfy the criteria of section 35 then we will not have to resort to Third Party
Disclosure as he
479,
should disclose. We may still have to do Third Party disclosure if he redacts information that
may be relevant. A decision cannot be made on this until we receive either
(a) the file from the insurance company or
(b) the insurance company is unwilling to disclose in which case Third party Disclosure kicks
in again. The section 8 application was sent off today. I had asked Jemi to amend and he had