Page 57 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Josephine
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Josey
Thank you for the update I understand now as to the section 35. Simon has just got here as he
is due to have a meeting at 3pm today with a next solicitor; he has read the emails and asked
me to write
486,
this to you. If you are still willing represent him then he is fine with this, as he was only upset
due to him believing things was not being done in time and him believing this would impact
his life for longer. As he said the other day, he is sorry for the disagreement that happened on
the phone. If you could let him know how you feel about this before 14.30, he would be
grateful.
Simon / Lorraine
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 February 2014 12:17
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on
Hi Lorraine
Trevor Allaway has indicated that he will view a section 35 request favourably. If he agrees
that we satisfy the criteria of section 35 then we will not have to resort to Third Party
Disclosure as he should disclose. We may still have to do Third Party disclosure if he redacts
information that may be relevant. A decision cannot be made on this until we receive either
(a) the file from the insurance company or
(b) the insurance company is unwilling to disclose in which case Third party Disclosure kicks
in again.
The section 8 application was sent off today. I had asked Jemi to amend and he had not, so I
amended it and sent it off. Lorraine as Simon's case is in the warned list there is no guarantee
that he will get Jemi to do the trial. He is still booked to do the case, but this is dependent on
other cases not over running or him being instructed in a weeklong case. Simon's conference
with Jemi in December was a classic example of this. He was dealing with a child neglect
case which over ran and had Simon's case been listed then Jemi would not have been able to
do the case. Jemi or his Chambers may be willing to do the case. The court can direct that
legal representation stay in place for the purposes of Counsel conducting Simon's trial and
possibly for a pretrial conference, but their diaries change and this affects their availability. I
hope this clarifies.
Regards
Josephine
487,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
wrote:
Hi Josey
Thank you for the update but I am not sure what the email means to Trevor Allaway. Does
this mean they will give you the file without 3rd party?
Really not sure what it means.
Lorraine
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 February 2014 11:50
To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth
Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on
Dear Simon / Lorraine