Page 6 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 6
case based on Simon's conduct before arrest, in interview and his previous convictions. The
point that Simon is missing is that a prima facie case exists, and this case will go to trial.
Simon should reread his interview and his attitude in his interview where he effectively
suggests it serves the owner of the premises right for having his premises burgled. If Simon
had not made such foolish comments when he was arrested and instead followed sound legal
advice at the police station then we could have made representations to review the case but
based on his admissions at his address, coupled with his interview this was impossible. At the
start of this case Simon was very much mistaken with regards to the law. Tactics and timing
are important in cases. Simon does not want to allow Solicitors to make tactical decisions so
the best of luck to him. Once I get an email back from Jemi re the conference and section 8
application I will be listing this case to have the legal representation order revoked. During
the telephone conversation today Simon again was abusive, he questioned my professional
integrity, my ability to defend my clients and he threatened to slander my name. I heard him
loud and clear Lorraine. All I can say is he has a very short memory. I know exactly how
many times I have represented Simon and how many of those cases have resulted in a charge
or a conviction. I am duty solicitor at court tomorrow and I will email Jemi in the morning. I
will request an urgent response from him, and I will then let you know when the case will be
listed.
Kind regards
Josephine
Hi Josey
Simon has asked me to write this email, so I am just writing what has been asked and the
facts he is saying. As you are aware Simon is not great with Emails or letters and replying to
them due to his writing and spelling. Simon has said he is not treating you in anyway, yes, he
did say he was going to put his papers on Facebook to ask people what they feel about his
case. He would then be able to obtain feedback from the general public. He feels there have
been many errors in his case, some of these errors he wants me to list below.
437,
His case was listed for the warn list for the
16/12/2013,
this could not happen due to issues with the crown not giving the information over. You at
this time wanted it to go to trial and the morning the trail started wanted to list information
that was needed for Simon case. When Simon went to see his Barrister on the
13/12/2013
the barrister new nothing about the case and asked Simon to explain what his case was about.
While Simon was explaining his barrister told Simon not to rush, Simon showed the barrister
the invoices for the case and the barrister said these invoices were hear say, can he prove the
items were even in the building at the time Simon was there. The Barrister asked where the
disclosure, as what we showed him was rubbish. We had most of the case files with us that
you had emailed to us. The Barrister asked has a section 8- and Third-Party Disclosure been
put in, we told him no he said as soon as we get back get your solicitors to put a section 8-
and Third-Party Disclosure in it should have been done already don’t delay get it done today.
Solicitors aren't doing the job properly get onto them. The Barrister asked when is this in
court we said next week, to which he said I don’t even know why you've been sent to me for
this meeting as I’m on another case until Tuesday, Wednesday so won’t be able to represent
you. The barrister also told me to get a copy of my interview tapes and go over them and
mark any part that is wrong on the crown’s paperwork. Simon had about a 20 min with his
barrister before the barrister had to go back into court. When an application for a Section 8-
and Third-Party Disclosure was put into the court on the
19/12/2013