Page 9 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

On the
21/01/2014
my mum emailed you about the application for my curfew for my birthday, you replied to
this asking for his plains for his birthday so you could put the application into the court. On
the
22/01/2014
when I went to mums, she showed me the email I was upset with this due to the fact I did not
see why I needed to give the locations as to where I was going. You said you had to have this
to put the application in. My mum emailed you the details as to where I was going. As we
had not heard anything, I believed the application had been put in and that it should have
been heard on The
24/01/2014
my mum late on the
24/01/2014
emailed you and texted you to get an update as to the application. There was no reply to this
from you until the
27/01/2014
where you told us, the application could not be put in due the notice you need to give the
court.
440,
You also in that email explained the process needed for the Third-Party Disclosure
application. In which was the 1st time I knew a letter would be needed to be sent to the
insurance company and they would need to refuse to hand over the files before you could go
for the Third-Party Disclosure application through the court. And also give me an update as
to the section 8 application that you could confirm that Jemi has drafted the section 8
application that requires minor amendments before it can be served. But you knew this was
needed when the application was put into the court on the
19/12/2014
when the application was heard for the section 8- and Third-Party Disclosure. So why was
this only being address on
27/01/2014
when this then had already passed the date of the
16/01/2014
to hand the application into the court.
I feel this delay will again make my case take longer as there is still going to be a time given
by the court to the crown to reply to the applications. On the
29/01/2013
a reply was made by email from my mum. Explaining parts in the letter that you attached to
the email you sent on the
27/01/2014
for Nikki Diamond about the discloser of the file was not correct and needed amended. She
also wrote that I still wanted a statement taken from Nikki Diamond due to this helping my
case. You replied to this email on the
29/01/2014
saying that, the statement from Nikki Diamond will follow after the Insurance Company
discloses the claims made by Mr Patel, whether voluntarily or by Third Party disclosure. I do
feel this statement is 100% needed sooner not later as once this is shown to the crown I sure
they will rethink their case on me. As I feel at this time this is an unfair trail due to how Mr
Patel has used my case to be able to manipulate his insurance claim due to what has already