Page 261 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

insurance this would not have covered him, and the police officer would have known this
already as my son had given the police officer his policy at the side of the road. My son was
arrested and taken to the police station. Due to him refusing to sign the seizer notice and
telling the police officer he was lying and to arrest him. My sons Van registration CX52JRZ
was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound, with no tools in there. The police
office when wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call but with
something totally incorrect information. The judge asked the police office at court about the
tools as he saw emails from KGM the police office told the judge he knew nothing about any
tools. The police officer I believed new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls
was already being put into the police about complaints. So changed his story in his statement.
The facts are that there are audio tapes of what the police officer said to KGM, and also the
call that was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all calls. I have both of
the audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a manager sent to
Kelly Tiller at KGM. How can a police officer act in such a manner? I really do not
understand why he did this. As also said on the phone there is a number of summons my son
has not had regarding the other stops from police, these cases he has gone to court without
him knowing and he been found guilty when he did not even know there was a case in court.
I have sent many emails to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to the
court. 2 case we had to do statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for Bromley. The
Willesden one seems to have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing
again he was found guilty but they put this case under a new case number looking at the letter
so all the documents that were sent before was not with the court file I would have through.
But with both statutory declarations we added a copy of his insurance. I have been trying for
some time to get all of this put together so it can all be addresses and so far, nothing has been
done with all the emails I have sent to the court. We also asked at court when we went to
Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, but nothing was done. Could you please tell us where we can
sort this out about getting all the other cases addressed without the need to be going from one
court to the next. This is a waste of courts time and money when clearly all that is needed to
be is check my son’s insurance that he was in fact insured. I am sure that the letter that has
been sent of Indemnity from KGM would cover these other cases as proof he was in fact
insured. Could you please advise what needs to be done with these other cases? Please can
you address the issues in this email and get back to me by email.
Regards
Lorraine Cordell

2
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
441. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ Re_ Simon Cordell_ (2)
/ Page Numbers: 1506,1507,
From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 05 February 2015 16:53
To: 'listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk'
Cc: London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk
swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
Subject: FW: Re: Simon Cordell
Attachments: AppealCaseDrivingTools26112014.
pdf; S Cordell 020215.pdf;
MT Under writing _FW_ MR SIMON CORDELL CX52 JRZ.pdf;
s Cordell call from police 141113.wma;
26_11_2013_13_53__KellyTiller Kelly call to compound.wav