Page 264 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 264

doing odd jobs. Under my son insurance this would not have covered him, and the police
               officer would have known this already as my son had given the police officer his policy at the
               side of the road.
               My son was arrested and taken to the police station. Due to him refusing to sign the seizer
               notice and telling the police officer he was lying and to arrest him.
               My sons Van registration CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound,
               with no tools in there.
               The police office when wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call but
               with something totally incorrect information. The judge asked the police office at court about
               the tools as he saw emails from KGM the police office told the judge he knew nothing about
               any tools.
               The police officer I believed new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls was
               already being put into the police about complaints. So changed his story in his statement.
               The facts are that there are audio tapes of what the police officer said to KGM, and also the
               call that was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all calls.
               I have both of the audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a
               manager sent to Kelly Tiller at KGM.
               How can a police officer act in such a manner. I really do not understand why he did this.
               As also said on the phone there is a number of summons my son has not had regarding the
               other stops from police, these case he have gone to court without him knowing and he been
               found guilty when he did not even know there was a case in court.
               I have sent many emails to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to the
               court. 2 case we had to do statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for Bromley. The
               Willesden one seems to have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing
               again he was found guilty but they put this case under a new case number looking at the letter
               so all the documents that were sent before was not with the court file I would have through.
               But with both statutory declarations we added a copy of his insurance.
               I have been trying for some time to get all of this put together so it can all be addresses and so
               far, nothing has been done with all the emails I have sent to the court. We also asked at court
               when we went to Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, but nothing was done. Could you please tell
               us where we can sort this out about getting all the other cases addressed without the need to
               be going from one court to the next. This is a waste of courts time and money when clearly
               all that is needed to be is check my son's insurance that he was in fact insured. I
                am sure that the letter that has been sent of Indemnity from KGM would cover these other
               cases as proof he was in fact insured. Could you please advise what needs to be done with
               these other cases.
               Please can you address the issues in this email and get back to me by email.
               Regards
               Lorraine Cordell
               471,
   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269