Page 110 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

can you let me know about the below email and how it can be dealt with please?
Regards
Lorraine
From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 20 March 2017 14:08
To: 'Lemmy Nwabuisi'
Subject: RE: Antisocial
Behaviour Allegations against Mr Simon Cordell [SEC=OFFICIAL]
18/03/2017
Dear Lemmy Nwabuisi
I'd like to apologise for the late reply to this email, I've just come out of hospital after
undergoing two operations
and only got released from hospital late on the 17 March 2017. You stated in your letter to
Mr Cordell, that the first letter you wrote was dated 29 December 2016, and that you set a
meeting for 6 December 2016 this is incorrect, as the date for the meeting was set for 6
January 2017, yes this meeting was cancelled, you've then stated you wrote a letter on 31
January 2017 to arrange a meeting for 9 February 2017, this meeting was also cancelled, the
reason these two meetings were cancelled was due to the ongoing complaint that was being
addressed by Enfield council that still needs addressing but due to the data that came back
from the subject access request and it not being completed properly this letter still needs to be
reply to, there was also a subject access request that was put in to Enfield Council that we
was waiting to be addressed and to receive the data back which as you are aware did take a
considerable amount of time, and also the complaint also was delayed in a reply. As stated to
you via email we felt it was unjustified to hold a meeting when there was an ongoing
complaint, and a subject access request that we were waiting for, as you are aware there are
still issues regarding the subject access request, which does need to be addressed. You then
stated that she wrote again on 16 February 2017 and arranged a meeting for 22 February 2017
which was also cancelled, but you was also notified there was still issues with the subject
access request, and that I had a meeting regarding the issues which was set for the 9 March
2017, I stated to you that I would get back to you with a convenient date for the meeting to
take place, but due to illness things have got delayed. You have also stated that it is very
unfortunate that there have been repeated refusals to meet in regards to the issues with the
neighbours, I feel that this is very misleading we have not refused once to have a meeting
with you, but due to ongoing issues meetings have had to be cancelled with a justified reason,
so how you can take this as a refusal is beyond me, we have kept you informed at every stage
of every letter that you send out giving you reasons as to why the meetings could not take
place. Therefore, I do not understand how you can interpret this as a refusal. You will also be
aware that my son does have health problems and that he does not leave his flat, not once
have you thought in all the letters that you sent out how someone that does not leave his flat
is going to be able to attend a meeting at the Civic Centre, therefore I am asking for the
meeting to take place at Mr Cordell's home address, due to Mr Cordell's health, arrangements
will need to be made that someone is at the meeting with Mr Cordell, and under no
circumstances will Mr Cordell be addressing the issues while he is on his own. You have also
stated that if Mr Cordell does not attend or set a new date that you will be putting an
application seeking possession of his home, it seems that Enfield Council have already made
their mind up that Mr Cordell is guilty of what has been alleged in the complaints, you also
state that if any further allegations are made against Mr Cordell that you can take legal action,
since your last update with the dates has there been any more allegations against Mr Cordell?