Page 312 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

this the Appellant and the Appellant mother would have asked her to relist the case to the
Court and asked for this to be clarified, as the disclosure that we was asking for was very
important to the ongoings of the Appeal.
122. The Appellant mother then handed the Appellant the phone the Appellant asked Ms
Ward about the letter he was supposed to have sent to the Court and the prosecuting
barrister, the Appellant was still thinking she was talking about the letter handed to the
Judge on the 04/04/2016 when Miss Ward was not.
123. Also in Court on this date, it was said the Appellant had written this letter himself,
which was not the case.
124. In truth The Appellant agreed for a letter that Miss Ward had written in reply to the
Judge's letter for the Appellant to be amended, he had amended it himself and it was to be
handed into the court, the Appellant solicitor was at Court so she knew the Appellant had
amended the letter, this is to be inclusive of it being sent to her by email, as she was in the
court on this date to.
125. On this date when Miss Ward was a court she said to the judge that the Appellant had
drafted the letter when the Appellant had only amended it, Miss Ward continued to say,
that she did not draft the Letter and that the Appellant wrote it, this is not true, at this the
Appellant did call Miss ward a lair as the Appellant knew Miss Ward had drafted the
letter herself at first.
126. The Appellant later explained to Miss Ward on the phone that he could prove the truth
and said I have the emails you sent to me and my mother of the letter we talk about and
me amending it, in return for you. It was also explained to all that we have kept copies of
all other correspondence between our persons and this is to include (Since the start of the
Court proceedings.
127. The Appellant mother has checked the dates for when this letter was drafted by The
Appellant solicitor and then returned to her, the date was on the 03/04/2016 please see
attached email and letter (marked 03/04/2016 Ms Ward).
128. The Appellant barrister was listening to the phone call and after the Appellant ended
the barrister got up and said I will need to think about still representing you as you called
your solicitors a lair, the Appellant stated that he can prove that Miss Ward wrote the
letter and she's denying as to doing so and further expressed himself in question the line
of investigation by saying:- “how would anyone body else's feel, if she had lied about
them,” the Appellant barrister then replied that if he was still going to represent the
Appellant then there would need to be a meeting at the Appellant barrister chambers, at
this point the meeting concluded, with nothing else really spoke of about the Appellant
Appeal yet again, this was days before the Appeal hearing was due to start once again.
129. Up to here for now: -
130. A while after the Solicitor wrote a letter and sent it to the Appellant and the
Appellants mother, the date of this received email is dated 20/09/2016 and a copy had
also been sent to the Court, this application was put in so for the acting solicitor to once
again attempt to be removed from the record this was done to our surprise and was listed
in Court to be heard on the 21/09/2016.
131. There were large sections of this letter that were incorrect and did not happen so
therefore are not true; this can also be proven by the Court transcripts from the
16/09/2016.
132. On the 21/01/2016 we were on our way to Court and got caught in traffic, we
contacted the Court to get a message to the Judge to say that we were going to be five to
ten minutes late, “I know the Judge got the message.”