Page 314 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

and been paginated totally different from the bundles that were being used by the
prosecution barrister and Courts.
143. When we were in Court, we did say this to the Judge about the bundles, the Judge
ordered the clerk of the Court to contact Michael Carroll and Co solicitors and order the
solicitors to bring the bundles to Court. The solicitors informed the clerk that the bundles
were at Nexus Chambers, the Judge was shocked that the solicitors did not have a copy of
the bundles at their office. The Appellant's uncle who was also at Court said to the Judge
he was willing to go to Nexus Chambers and pick the bundles up.
144. The Judge listed this for the 22/09/2016 after 14:00 hours to make sure we were all
working from them same set of bundles.
145. Upon the Appellant's uncle getting home it was seen that the bundle he had collected
was not the full set of bundles and only had part of the applications Skeleton Bundle.
146. On the 22 September 2016 we attended Court to inform the Judge we still did not
have the updated bundles and the Judge once again got the clerk of the Court to call
Michael Carroll and co solicitors to find out what was going on within the bundles, the
Judge was very upset that we still did not have the bundles for the case, the Judge asked
for the bundles to be brought to Court before 4 PM, The Appellant's mother stated that it
would be easier and faster for her to pick the bundles up from the solicitors on the way
home from Court, the Judge asked if she was sure that he could get them brought to Court
she stated that it be faster for her to pick the bundles up from the solicitors on my way
home.
147. When we left Court due to the time and the circumstances we had been placed in The
Appellant mother called Michael Carroll's office to say what time we would be there by,
The Appellant mother was told that the office would be closed by the time we got there so
The Appellant mother agreed to pick the bundles up first thing in the morning on 23
September 2016.
148. On 23-09-2016 The Appellant mother left home early in the morning to go to Michael
Carroll's office and collect the bundles with her brother, Mr A Cordell they went into the
office together to get the bundles, when the solicitor came down the stairs he had a piece
of paper that The Appellant mother needed to sign, stating that the bundles had been
collected from the office.
149. Upon getting home and looking at the bundles, The Appellant mother noticed there is
now at least 13 additional statements that The Appellant and The Appellant mother had
never seen before from the Respondent bundle, this is a clear error as we knew that in the
first bundle there were only 4 public witness statements and there now seems to be 16,
when taking a closer look at the statements we noticed there are no members of the
public's statements of truth and this also applied for the original 4 contained in the folder
minus one, this also highlighted that each member of the public's statements are police
officers only and have each put their signatures on two different statements each, in a
pretence of portraying to own two houses each in Edmonton xxx Gardens and other
surrounding roads in an around Progress way, the police officers are claiming to be
victims of this case while on active duty.
150. So in understanding this, the Applicant contacted Edmonton police stations lost
property room, so too for him to arrange collection of the original bundle, that was never
served to him in accordance with the law. To his further upset and disappointment of
justice he was to be told by another police officer deployed at the lost property room as
the manager, that the bundle that the Appellant wanted to claim had been misplaced or
stolen, this file clearly shows that there was only ever four potential members of the
publics witness statements attached within side of the original Asbo application.