Page 322 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

his condition could be applied by any Judge and state it is not a beach of someone human
rights must be wrong.
• jiojiojioj
• Conditions 2 states knowingly using or supplying property personal or otherwise for the
use of a rave as defined under section 63.1 of the criminal justice and public order act,
212. The Appellants has spent the last 10 years building his business saving every penny
and help from family it is within the entertainment industry, he will hires equipment out
and his services, The Appellants business would seriously be affected, because if he hired
his equipment and it ended up in an illegal rave The Appellant would be in breach of the
conditions. When hiring out equipment you do asked what is going to be used for, and
you do have a contract that is in place, but what the person tells you their reason for
hiring the equipment out is not always the correct reason and is not used for the purpose
the person told you The Appellant would be in breach of these conditions. Also if The
Appellant loaned someone any personal belongings and that person ended up at an illegal
rave then The Appellant would again be in breach of his conditions, even if the item was
something that did not even constitute as being for an illegal rave.
213. Conditions 5 states provide any service in respect of any licensable activity in an
unlicensed premise.
214. How is The Appellant meant to run his business, The Appellant would not be able to
obtain a licence that has already been clarified by the police and councils due to the
Antisocial Behaviour Order that is in place, The Appellant would not be able to offer his
services also due to the restriction that he has only 30 minutes within a non-residential
building, most events go to the late hours in the morning so even if there was a licensed
premises and someone wanted to hire the services of The Appellant The Appellant would
not be able to do this. The Appellant was also offered contracts within two nightclubs to
be the manager if The Appellant was again offered contracts within nightclubs or late-
night bars The Appellant would not be able to accept these contracts. I cannot even say
why condition 5 has been imposed because condition 4 conflicts with condition 5 in
certain parts. And who would want to hire or take on The Appellant if he had to ask for
written permission which would be degrading for The Appellant to have to ask each time
he wanted to go somewhere or had a contact and had to explain why he needed it to be
confirmed in writing by the owner and/or leaseholder of the property,
215. These are just a few concerns with the conditions that The Appellant is under, there is
other concerns with other conditions set at by the Courts that are of concern.
216. When the Appeal hearing was over the conditions was not served on The Appellant,
they were posted to him in the post.
217. The Appellant mother has put an application into the Crown Court on forms EX-105
and EX-107 requesting the Tape/Disc Transcription for all hearings, and is waiting to
hear back from the court, to see if it will be granted.
218. The Appellant mother has also put an application into the police under a subject
access request to get all The Appellant history with the police which will show the data
protection errors and more data that has been inputted incorrectly by the police, it will
also show a history of how much the police does not leave The Appellant alone.
219. Also how many complaints has had to be put into the police regarding how the police
have treated
220. The Appellant over many years which when asked in this ASBO application case by
the judge was any of this the truth they replied no to. The Judge also asked if anyone else
had had an ASBO application against them for an ASBO on the dates held within the
ASBO application, the Judge did not get a reply and it was not asked again.