Page 318 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

178. On the 19/12/2016 The Appellant mother sent an email to the Judge this was in
regards to still not finding a solicitor, that was willing to take the Appeal on, The
Appellant mother asked the Judge to help in regards to getting a solicitor to act for The
Appellant regarding the Appeal as time was becoming short for the Appeal hearing.
179. On the 21/12/2016 The Appellant mother received a reply in her email from the
Judge; this explained that the Judge could not help with a solicitor. The Appellant mother
and Appellant still did not give up, they both carried on trying to find one that was willing
to take the Appeal on for The Appellant, the Appellant and his mother was upset the
reason being; as the Judge did state he would help with the issue of the solicitor on the
26/09/2016 and another part of the reason being that time was short for when the Appeal
hearing was to take place, as this was due to start soon after. The Appellant and his
mother did not wait till the last minute to ask the Judge for help and was then told by the
Judge that he could not help.
180. On the 12/01/2016 late in the day The Appellant mother was given a number form a
solicitor's of a solicitor's called MK-Law, that maybe could help and take the Appeal on,
The Appellants mother called them as they were the first solicitor's in the list she was
given.
181. The entire of the solicitor's firms that had been contacted prior to September 2016 had
simply refused to act in the case; the reason given was because the case was at an Appeal
stage. Throughout our attempts to find a solicitor, No solicitor firm that was called
wanted to hear what we had to explain so to be able to understand what the case was
about, on one occasion the Applicants mother broke down in tears to the company she
was talking to and they agreed to take on the case, this was as long as the Judge agreed to
an adjournment, the Applicants mother, stated to them she did nothing the Judge will
agree to this as in September 2016 the Judge had stated he would not adjourn it again.
182. The solicitor stated that they would not have enough time to be able to get all of the
bundles and then be able to get a barrister to go over them and that this would not leave
time for them as the new acting solicitors to have time to have a meeting with The
Appellant and
171,
183. take instructions due to the weekend.
184. The new solicitor firm said that they would send a barrister to Court on the
17/01/2017, to asked for an adjournment, so that they could act in the best interest of the
client, as that is what they are there to do and so that the legal aid could be addressed and
then passed over to them or a new application would need to be applied for.
185. The Appellant's health had deteriorated, when The Appellant's mother told The
Appellant she believed she had found a solicitor to take the Appeal on this did bring his
mood up a little bit, but he felt so much had gone wrong within the Asbo case that there
would be a high chance of more going wrong at that point of time, he agreed that he
would attend Court and meet the barrister that the new solicitors was sending, the
problem was that this person could change at any time.
186. The Appellant does not leave his home which he treats as his prison cell due to the
Asbo case and prudery the police have committed and not disciplinarily action,
punishment, being brought into motion for their wrongful actions.
187. On the 17 January 2016, the Appellant and his mother attended the Court, the new
barrister was there also for The Appellant, so was the Appellants uncle, we all went into a
side room and the barrister spoke to The Appellant, this was in regards to what the plans
were for the case in turn what the new barrister was going to ask the Judge for, which was
an adjournment, the reason being they needed an adjournment so that they could act in the
best interest of their client, so that they could go over the complete case bundles, take