Page 262 - tmp

protection acts in which have not been dealt with and I have heard nothing
from KGM.

I have been back and forward to court due to no insurance and in fact 4
cases I did not get any summons so was in fact found guilty as I did not
know it was even going to court.

I have had points put on my driving licence for no reason and had to go back
and forward to court many times when this should not have been the case.

Then the case come up for the seizer when the police said I had tools in my
van I went to court with all my documents but due to not having the
information I had asked for from KGM many times about that case I was found
guilty. I am very upset about the whole policy with KGM. I have put an
appeal in and this case will be going to crown court I have again asked for
information and again heard nothing. These matters need to be addressed as I
am suffering due to all of this.

Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows everything that has gone on as he
was my main contact.

I also have all the emails the last one that I will enclose again, which I
have heard nothing about and the 1st Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the 26/11/2013. I did in fact send the
Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 about time times
and asked Martin Jenkins to look into why I had heard nothing about more
then once.

Once I get the appeal date for crown court I will ask the court to summons
the people at KGM to deal with this matter as they know I was insurance and
did nothing wrong and the police lied. All I have asked for is the data so
there will be no need to summons people this way I can send the section 9
witness statements over to the crown and the other information and this case
should be dropped against me.

It just seemed that KGM does not want to do anything and give me the
information I need to prove in fact I was insurance and the police lied to
KGM to in fact make it that I was not insurance.

1240