Page 331 - 2. 2013 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 331

7
               •  The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
                   72. Lorraine Cordell _FW_ Ponders End Floor Plan_ (3) / Page Numbers: 151
                   Gazebo Case!
                   My Company Too Smooth!

                   8
               •  The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
                   Date: Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 1:26 PM
                   From: Mother
                   Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell for plea and case management hearing on
                   Gazebo Case!
                   DWP!

               --

               1
               The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
               66. JOSEPHINE Ward _Regina v_ (3)
               / Page Numbers: 134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141
               From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
               Sent: 10 August 2013 12:23
               To: Lorraine Cordell; michael@michaelcarrollandco.com
               Subject: plea and Regina v. Simon Cordell for case management hearing on
               4th September 2013
               at Woolwich Crown Court
               Dear Lorraine / Simon
               Thank you for your telephone call today. I am copying Michael Carroll into this email as he is now
               overseeing and monitoring all the work that I undertake in this case to ensure that I am preparing your
               case properly and to your satisfaction and complying with your instructions. I set out below the main
               content of our conversation but if I have left anything out please come back to me as soon as possible.
               INSTRUCTIONS:
               Simon you confirmed that your benefits had been suspended and you did not have the funds to attend
               the police station every day. You stated that Edmonton Police Station is a 2-mile walk from where
               you currently live. You have asked me to make an application to remove this bail condition.
               Secondly, you have asked that your curfew be suspended for an up and coming festival in Enfield.
               Thirdly, you have asked me to consider the merits of making an application to dismiss the charges
               against you based on the fact that you entered a building that was being squatted in and therefore you
               were not a trespasser.
               Fourthly you stated that the photographs sent to you were of poor quality and were in black and
               white.
               Fifth, you complained that the barrister did not present your case properly.
               Six, you requested your case papers from the Winchester case. I will deal with each of the points that
               you have raised and the agreed action.
               Point (1) I can make this application to remove the reporting the condition. I can source a map from
               the internet to show the distance and I can also show bus prices on an Oyster card £2.80 per day in
               fares as I assume only one bus is required. If I am wrong in this assumption can you, please confirm
               by email the number of buses and the routes that the buses take at your earliest convenience. Can you
               also please ask your mother to email over the letters that you have sent to the Benefits Agency
               appealing and requesting the reinstatement of your benefits as this will assist my application.
               Point (2) Again I can make an application to suspend your curfew on the dates of the festival but
               again I need the documentation from the Council regarding this to support your application.
               Point (3) I will have to consider this point in more detail but if I can illustrate an analogy to you
               which I believe that the Judge will also use. Your case is that you were not a trespasser when you
   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336