Page 20 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

I made the bail variation as requested and you were not happy as the court did not suspend
your curfew. That is the simple fact of the matter here. You also stated that during a
conference with Jemi, the barrister that I appointed for you that he also advised you that I was
a poor solicitor and not acting in your best interests. You only raised this today and I will
most certainly be taking this accusation up with Jemi and his clerks. I asked you to confirm
this in writing and you have refused to do this. I again ask you to confirm this in writing as
Jemi will have to respond to this allegation. I will be asking Jemi and his clerks to comment
on the allegations that you have made. You will of course appreciate that if Jemi does not
agree with your accusations that he will probably refuse to represent you. You are accusing
him of slandering my reputation by saying that Jemi says I am not representing you properly
and that he advised you to change your solicitors. With regards to your complaint in relation
to the bail variation you were asked in a number of emails to provide full details of your
plans, venues etc and you did not do this instead you shouted down the phone and refused to
give specific instructions. When you eventually did give the requested information, it was too
late to apply to have the bail position varied. I suspect you know what the court's attitude to
the requested variation would be in any event. With regards to the request for the original
receipt I have to provide this to the court in an addendum to your defence case statement and
the police will then make their enquiries. I am sorry that this position has arisen, but you have
left me little choice in the matter. I wish you good luck with your case and I will confirm the
date that your case is listed for the revocation of legal aid. I will aim from Tuesday or
Wednesday of this coming week. Can you please confirm by return email the advice that
Jemi gave you at your conference at Isleworth Crown Court and also please confirm why it
took you so long to raise it with me?
You telephoned me on a Sunday, reserved for emergency phone calls. You should have
raised it back when you had the conference with Jemi. You have raised it now and I will deal
with the accusations now. I await hearing from you by return email with regards to Jemi.
Regards
Josephine Ward
MICHAEL CARROLL & CO SOLICITIORS

2
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
191. JOSEPHINE WARD_
/ Page Numbers: 449,450,451
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 February 2014 23:51
To: Lorraine Cordell
Hi Josey
Lorraine as a matter of respect to you I have responded to the most recent email now that I
have some time. My replies to Simon are in bold. I accept that Simon believes his comments
before being arrested are not damaging to his case and he believes that his interview is well
thought out and legally reasoned. Unfortunately, I do not agree with Simon's belief that his
comments and interview are not damaging to the case - they are what made the difference in
this case. Thank you for the reply to Simon’s email, Simon has asked me to write this email
for him. The section of my email that was sent to you yesterday that address Jemi and the
meeting we had come from my friend Katie who did attend the meeting with Jemi with me,
so new what was said and I used her words as to what she heard at the meeting as to what
Jemi said to me. If needed Katie could confirm this so can my mum as she was the one
writing the email for me that was sent yesterday. Could you also please send me a copy as to
what you have sent over to Jemi by email and his reply to your email?