Page 23 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

I believe also that it could be taken to the high court for a judicial review about my bail
condition, but I was never made aware of this. Seeing as the crown court attitude in this case
has never been good as you have put it. And that the court is unwilling to see that I need to
work or face losing my business.
(g) The bail conditions imposed by the Court are not unreasonable. They are imposed to
prevent the commission of further offences and failure to surrender. I have never tried to
blame other people for the position I find myself in, what I am saying is I don’t feel as if
things are being done in a timely manner.
If you just look at the Third Party Disclosure, if you knew that you had to write to Nikki
Diamond and get her to say in writing her unwillingness to disclose the file before you could
then apply for the Third Party Disclosure, why did you not write the letter back in
Dec 2013
after the application was put into the court on the
19/12/2013
or after you come back from annual leave, due to knowing that you needed this before the
16/01/2014
that the judge had said.
(h) The information that forms part of Third-Party Disclosure was originally requested in
your defence case statement. Your trial is now scheduled for
June 2014
and yes, in an ideal world I should have sent a letter to Nikki Diamond and the insurance
company. Nikkii Diamond has to refuse to give the information first of all before the Court
will even entertain an application for Third Party Disclosure and then the Court could direct
the information to be brought to court for the trial. This is what happens in Social Services
cases by way of example. We would request paper copies, failing that then a statement from
Nikki Diamond. If the insurance file is served, then Nikki Diamond is not required as a
witness as the insurance claims and reports can be introduced under the hearsay rules. I do
understand you were waiting for Jemi to do the write up for the section 8 and that was out of
your control. But the Third-Party Disclosure was not. Also why was it when we told you
about getting a statement from Nikki Diamond did you not say then you had to wait until the
Third-Party Disclosure was given as she would not be able to do a statement without client
confidentiality arising which would have caused issues. You told me on the phone that if you
got the statement from Nikki Diamond then the bail condition change, I wanted for my
birthday should not be a problem.
(I) I said it was worth a try. I did not put it any higher than this. I do not recall saying it
would not be a problem but words to the effect that it would be worth a try. We are covering
old ground here as I was also reliant on specific information that you refused to give as you
felt the court had no right to know your movements. Can you also keep me updated as to the
date for court so I can attend?
(j) No problem I am hoping to resolve this matter once I speak to Michael Carroll tomorrow
in the afternoon so I will be asking for a hearing on either Thursday or Friday of this week.
Simon

3
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
192. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell - application to transfer legal representation
/ Page Numbers: 451,452,453,454,455,456,457,458,459,
From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 03 February 2014 18:51
To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'