Page 25 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

times they attended the building on that evening even down to the council attending with the
police due to noise. There is also the case as to when I turned up at the building and the
police was already there, how is it when they did their checks, they did not see that a
Burglary had happened on that building on the
16/02/2013
and let us
452,
enter the building knowing this as really, they would have got that report back on their checks
that evening Which in my eyes does show a cover up as where are the reports as it is to do
directly with my case. The DC dealing with my case also dealt with the other case on
16/02/2013
so, would also been aware of the condition of the building after the
16/02/2013
pictures where taken for the case of the
16/02/2013,
so, he would have been well aware the pictures taken for my case was the same so how could
he then charge me with all the damage to the building?
Where is the information that the police should have asked Mr Patel as to him securing the
building after the?
16/02/2013?
Yes I am upset as I do feel I have been setup by the police and they by doing this have
allowed Mr Patel to use my case to make his claim to the insurance company go ahead was
this planned from the start and yes I have asked this to myself many times and others I have
spoken to have said the same said thing. So yes, I want my trail sooner than later as I want to
get on with my life and my business and yes, I do understand I could be found guilty for this
case but until I do, I should be able to run my business. And I don’t think I am asking too
much here. I believe also that it could be taken to the high court for a judicial review about
my bail condition, but I was never be made aware of this. Seeing as the crown court attitude
in this case has never been good as you have put it. And that the court is unwilling to see that
I need to work or face losing my business. I have never tried to blame other people for the
position I find myself in, what I am saying is I don’t feel as if things are being done in a
timely manner. If you just look at the Third Party Disclosure, if you knew that you had to
write to Nikki Diamond and get her to say in writing her unwillingness to disclose the file
before you could then apply for the Third Party Disclosure, why did you not write the letter
back in
Dec 2013
after the application was put into the court on the
19/12/2013
or after you come back from annual leave, due to knowing that you needed this before the
16/01/2014
that the judge had said. I do understand you were waiting for Jemi to do the write up for the
section 8 and that was out of your control. But the Third-Party Disclosure was not. Also why
was it when we told you about getting a statement from Nikki Diamond did you not say then
you had to wait until the Third-Party Disclosure was given as she would not be able to do a
statement without client confidentiality arising which would have caused issues. You told me
on the phone that if you got the statement from Nikki Diamond then the bail condition
change, I wanted for my birthday should not be a problem. Can you also keep me updated as
to the date for court so I can attend?
Simon
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]