Page 347 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 347

grateful if the above could be confirmed. Our client is facing a charge of burglary based on
               damage caused. The case is listed in the warned list for trial in
               June 2014
               We thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter.
               Yours sincerely
               Josephine Ward
               818,
               MICHAEL CARROLL & CO

               3
               The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
               293. JOSEPHINE Ward _Regina v_ (25)
               / Page Numbers: 819,
               From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
               Sent: 09 April 2014 18:19
               To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth
               Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for trial at Woolwich Crown Court warned list
               Attachments: NAE 080414.pdf
               Dear Simon / Lorraine
               I refer to the above matter. I can confirm that Counsel has written on his court note that
               Simon is now subject to a condition of residence only. I will still request the bail sheet and
               forward it to you from the Crown Court to avoid any confusion. I attach a copy of a Notice of
               Additional Evidence dated
               08th April 2014
               You will no doubt note the discrepancies in the statement of DC Mayhew dated
               03rd April 2014.
               For clarification if there is no statement from the noise abatement officer by
               10th April 2014
               I will be listing the case for mention. The statement of DC Mayhew referring to the Inspector
               who attended on the date of the scene the day of the illegal rave is inaccurate. Inspector Mc
               Millen's statement refers to attending the scene of a reported burglary and he notes that there
               were no squatters signs up. I will therefore need Simon to deal with this in his proof
               exhibiting extracts of his Facebook page which shows the notices etc. I will be asking for the
               statements of the officers who attended with the noise abatement officers and all updates on
               the CAD system. I am asking for a copy of the CD of photographs from the SOCO from
               February 2013
               referred to in the statement of Paul Whittaker. In relation to the invoices served also dated
               01st March 2013
               and
               29th March 2013
               these were absent from the insurer's file of papers and reference was made to the second
               break in, in the report of Nikki Diamond. I will email Trevor Allaway to request confirmation
               as to whether the two invoices were ever sent to the insurance company and if so when. The
               bottom of the invoice also refers to an optional extra and there is no proof that Mr Patel ever
               paid for the damage to be repaired. The other point is that it seems a very long way for a
               West London builder to travel for £500 worth of work. I am going to ask whether the Patel's
               from Hounslow are related whether by family or business or whether Rakesh Patel or Deven
               Patel have any interests in this company. I will ask the insurance company if they have any
               knowledge of any connection between the Patel insurance clients and Patel the builders. I will
               also ask the CPS to ask Mr Patel for copies of any alternative quotes and a similar question
   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352