Page 348 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 348
will be posed to the insurance company. If you have any questions re the above can you
please email me as I am in and out of the office quite a
lot this week.
Regards
Josephine
PS I will CC you in on the email to Trevor All-day from the insurance company.
4
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
294. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (12)
/ Page Numbers: 820,821,
From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 09 April 2014 23:44
To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell for trial at Woolwich Crown Court warned list
Hi Josey
I have noted things also can you also ask how Mr Patel paid these invoices?
Not sure if that can be done and when I last spoke with Mr Allaway, he had been trying to get
a face to face meeting with Mr Patel each time he called to try and sort it someone picked the
phone up and said Mr Patel was on holiday. He also did not believe this and also and also
said that the invoiced that had been sent in was not real ones he knew they were fishy. Also
due to the x3 claims Nikki went to the warehouse on the
28/03/2013
after the 2nd breaking on the
25/03/2013
and from the file Mr Patel did not even tell her that he had fixed the wall and paid for it on
the
21/03/2014
and he must have known already that on the
29/03/2013
the same company was coming to fix the wall again. Nikki was there on the
28/03/2013
taking pictures. So why did he not tell her this then?
Also, he said he had to leave the warehouse as the insurance company wanted to take
pictures. Yet Nikki I am sure only went to the warehouse once and that was after the 2nd
breaking on the
25/03/2013
Also looking at the invoices they don’t even have an invoice number. There no costing for
anything on them. I would like the invoices checked and I mean really checked the right
person could tell when these invoices were printed. It’s also very funny that the same said
part of the wall was damaged 3 times if they had fixed it correctly it would have been much
harder as it was new why was the same said part of the wall now done 3 times. And yet also
in the file for the March claim Mr Patel only told the insurance company about the alarm
there was no wall said about in the March claim. I have not had time yet to look at all the
statements, but I will most likely have more to say and so will Simon. Also £600.00 to fix the
said wall and yet he is saying to the police £8000 to £10,000 for the damage to the
building?
And Mr Patel did not do stock take from
Feb 2013
case none was also done in