Page 344 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 344

(a) how many estimates obtained
               (b) when were they submitted. The missing invoice number will also be picked up by the
               insurance company but the main point we have to establish is when submitted. They appear
               to be backdated as not in original insurance file but I need insurance company to verify this
               before taking the matter any further. You know the old saying about giving a person enough
               rope. You have to wait, bide your time. I aim to do representations to CPS hopefully before
               weekend. As stated previously if no statement from noise abatement officer then I will get the
               case listed again with DC Mayhew to attend. He can explain why all statements with Mr
               Patel telephone statements. I am also going to ask for statement from manager of warehouse
               as to damage and also the so-called missing crime report.
               Regards
               Josephine
               From: Lorraine Cordell
               Sent: 09/ 04/ 2014 23:44
               To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
               Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell for trial at Woolwich Crown Court warned list
               Hi Josey
               I have noted things also can you also ask how Mr Patel paid these invoices?
               Not sure if that can be done and when I last spoke with Mr Allaway, he had been trying to get
               a face to face meeting with Mr Patel each time he called to try and sort it someone picked the
               phone up and said Mr Patel was on holiday. He also did not believe this and also and also
               said that the invoiced that had been sent in was not real ones he knew they were fishy. Also
               due to the x3 claims Nikki went to the warehouse on the
               28/03/2013
               after the 2nd breaking on the
               25/03/2013
               and from the file Mr Patel did not even tell her that he had fixed the wall and paid for it on
               the
               21/03/2014
               and he must have known already that on the
               29/03/2013
               the same company was coming to fix the wall again. Nikki was there on the
               28/03/2013
               taking pictures. So why did he not tell her this then?
               Also, he said he had to leave the warehouse as the insurance company wanted to take
               pictures. Yet Nikki I am sure only went to the warehouse once and that was after the 2nd
               breaking on the
               25/03/2013
               Also looking at the invoices they don’t even have an invoice number. There no costing for
               anything on them. I would like the invoices checked and I mean really checked the right
               person could tell when these invoices were printed. It’s also very funny that the same said
               part of the wall was damaged 3 times if they had fixed it correctly it would have been much
               harder as it was new why was the same said part of the wall now done 3 times. And yet also
               in the file for the March claim Mr Patel only told the insurance company about the alarm
               there was no wall said about in the March claim. I have not had time yet to look at all the
               statements, but I will most likely have more to say and so will Simon. Also £600.00 to fix the
               said wall and yet he is saying to the police £8000 to £10,000 for the damage to the building?
               816,
               And Mr Patel did not do stock take from
               Feb 2013
   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349