Page 167 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

send to you they do take their time. I am just happy this matter is getting address as said the
most worrying thing was the court case and this is the information I needed. I hope you have
a great time on leave. I look forward to hearing from you and will pass the information over
from the police compound as soon as I have it.
Regards
Simon
From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com]
Sent: 27 January 2015 10:05
To: Lorraine Cordell
Cc: Austin, Andrew
Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell
Dear Simon,
I spent some time last Friday tracking down a number of calls and did find the original call
that the Police made to Jessica and the calls Kelly made to the Compound so we can provide
these and it sounds like these are the important calls from the CPS and Courts viewpoint. I
will pass these over to our Data Protection Officer of course but will ask if its ok for me to
release them to you in the meantime before he does his official response. I think we should
also do the Letter of Indemnity and will send this across to you in the next few days, there’s
no reason why you can't send this across now and it can do no harm. I'm conscious we have
not done a formal final response yet to your complaint, I intend to do this as soon as we
receive full details of the recovery costs you incurred and can make a decision on
compensation, I trust that’s acceptable. If you need anything else or have any questions in the
meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us. I am keeping Andy in the loop as I am due to
go on leave from 12/2/15 ‐ 8/3/15 so he will need to pick up any issues that may arise during
that time. We will be in touch shortly and await details from you as above in due course.
King Regards
1375,
Mr Peter Wood
From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: 26 January 2015 23:10:04 GMT
To: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com>
Cc: complaints@lloyds.com <complaints@lloyds.com>
Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell
Dear Peter Wood
Thank you for picking this up and taking the time to deal with this matter. The date of the
appeal I do not have yet. I are waiting for this but the court and CPS said if I get the
information needed before the court date then it could be sent to the court who found me
guilty and the CPS and this would be linked to the case and addressed. In addition, there
should be no need for the appeal court case. I am trying to do this so that a next day is not got
to be wasted of my time in court and getting to and from the court. The day that the police
officer pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which the police officer lied, and
the police officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is 14/11/2013. I think due to what
the police officer said in court the CPS and judge would like to know the facts and what the
police officer said on that phone call to KGM. In addition, when KGM spoke to the manager
at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools, I think the reason for this is
the police officer committed perjury in the court. That is why they asked me to get proof that
my insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements as to what the police officer told
KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, In addition, the facts how KGM found out I
had in fact done nothing wrong and my insurance should not be cancelled. However, if you
think a Letter of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be done, I would be