Page 163 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

should be no need for the appeal court case. I am trying to do this so that a next day is not got
to be wasted of my time in court and getting to and from the court. The day that the police
officer pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which the police officer lied, and
the police officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is 14/11/2013. I think due to what
the police officer said in court the CPS and judge would like to know the facts and
1358,
what the police officer said on that phone call to KGM. In addition, when KGM spoke to the
manager at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools, I think the reason
for this is the police officer committed perjury in the court. That is why they asked me to get
proof that my insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements as to what the police
officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, In addition, the facts how KGM
found out I had in fact done nothing wrong and my insurance should not be cancelled.
However, if you think a Letter of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be
done, I would be very grateful, but could you include in the letter only reason this has come
about is due to what the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. In addition,
this is the reason KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the
insurance policy I had in force with them. This should cover it I hope as I really did nothing
wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied to get my insurance cancelled as she
spoke to the police compound and they told her there was no tools. The vehicle registration I
was driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included on my
insurance. So, should have shown on the database along with my car. However, none showed
up as being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me all the problems with
the police. As already aware yes, I was stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized. I
do have some of the some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the
vehicle out of the compound for the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up on the 16/11/2013. I
have the ones for the 08/04/2013, 29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 I just need to get the
receipts for the other dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to no
insurance from the police compound. As for the Data Subject Access Request, I am most
grateful that this is being addressed. If I had known a fee was, needed I would have paid that
right away, but due to no one getting back to me about the ones that were put in, I did not
know a fee was needed.
Regards
Simon Cordell
From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com]
Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694
Dear Mr Cordell,
Unfortunately, Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have
picked this matter up. The first order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case,
can you confirm when the date has been set for the hearing please? My thought is that we
provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically confirms that you had a valid policy in force
between said dates and on what vehicles, this should satisfy the Courts but if they need
anything else, we will be happy to assist, just let me know what you require.
1359,
I understand you were stopped several times and had vehicles seized, you are in the process
of obtaining evidence of these vehicle seizures and the costs incurred by you as a result for us
to consider
compensation. When you have gathered this please forward the evidence to us as soon as
possible. There is also the matter of your Data Subject Access Request. I have spent some