Page 198 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 198

Vanreciept10112013.jpg;
               MR SIMON CORDELL CX52 JRZ (28.9 KB)
               26_11_2013_13_53__KellyTiller Kelly call to compound.wav
               Hi Josey
               I got the attached information from Simon’s insurance company on Friday. After a lot of
               work to get it and a lot of emails and over a year of time. The letter of Indemnity is not
               correct with some points which I have asked peter wood to address. Simon has asked me to
               forward this to you. The reason is this show how far the police will go to lie. Not only did he
               lie to KGM Simon’s insurance, about tools being in Simon’s van to void Simon insurance
               cover and be able to seize his van. He then went on to lie in his statement of facts to be used
               at court saying nothing about tools just that the insurance said Simon’s was not covered by
               his insurance. He then stood up in court and under oath when the judge asked him about tools
               being in the van said he did not say tools was in the van. The reason the judge asked this was
               he saw emails from KGM saying about the tools. Simon was found guilty of this and we have
               taken it to appeal and are waiting on a date. But in the Asbo case can this not be shown that
               the police will lie even under oath. They are trying to use Simon’s char in the Asbo case and
               make him look bad. Why can we not show the police in the same light by using this
               information? Simon has asked can you get the case papers from the courts for this case and
               the Woolwich case. As these cases do show somewhat how far the police are willing to go
               with Simon. In the Asbo case papers you have police saying in their statement they know
               Simon is always insured it is on police file how much he was stopped. Yet he has around 8
               cases at court for no insurance. In addition, most of these cases he never had a summons for
               and they found him guilty due to him knowing nothing about the case was due to be in court.
               Regards
               Lorraine
               From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com]
               Sent: 30 January 2015 17:02
               To: Lorraine Cordell
               Cc: Austin, Andrew; Donovan, Paul
               Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell
               Dear Simon,
               Please find attached the following –
               •  Recording of the original call made by the Police officer to KGM in which he advised
                   that there were tools in your van.
               •  Recording of the call between Kelly Tiller and the Police compound in which Kelly was
                   advised that
               1429,
                   there were no tools in the vehicle.
               •  Receipt showing purchase of the van.
               •  E‐Mail from Gareth Mullett from the compound confirming that there was nothing on the
                   seizure notice to indicate that there were any tools removed from the vehicle or in the
                   vehicle in the compound.
               •  Letter of Indemnity for the CPS/Courts.
               I believe these are the relevant items you were after and hope this will assist you to resolve
               the court matters.
               If you need anything else please let me know, or in my absence Andy Austin. Paul Donovan
               will respond separately in respect of your data request but hopefully the attached will meet
               your requirements. As soon as I receive documentation from you to support costs incurred, I
               can consider our response on compensation. No doubt I will hear from you shortly, in the
               meantime have a good weekend.
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203