Page 204 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

397,398,399,400,401,402
403,404,405,406,407,408
409,410,411,412,413
--
387,
From: Lorraine Cordell
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
Sent: 31 January 2015 18:15
To: josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com
Cc: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com
re_wired@ymail.com
Subject: FW: MT3574694 Simon Cordell
Attachments: S Cordell 300115.pdf.
s Cordell call from police 141113.wma.
Van-reciept-10-11-2013.jpg.
MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ (28.9 KB); 26_11_2013_13_53
Kelly-Tiller-Kelly-call to compound.wav
Hi Josey
I got the attached information from Simon’s insurance company on Friday. After a lot of
work to get it and a lot of emails and over a year of time. The letter of Indemnity is not
correct with some points which I have asked peter wood to address.
Simon has asked me to forward this to you.
The reason is this show how far the police will go to lie. Not only did he lie to KGM Simon’s
insurance, about tools being in Simon’s van to void Simon insurance cover and be able to
seize his van. He then went on to lie in his statement of facts to be used at court saying
nothing about tools just that the insurance said Simon’s was not covered by his insurance. He
then stood up in court and under oath when the judge asked him about tools being in the van
said he did not say tools was in the van. The reason the judge asked this was he saw emails
from KGM saying about the tools.
Simon was found guilty of this and we have taken it to appeal and are waiting on a date.
But in the Asbo case can this not be shown that the police will lie even under oath. They are
trying to use Simon’s char in the Asbo case and make him look bad. Why can we not show
the police in the same light by using this information?
Simon has asked can you get the case papers from the courts for this case and the Woolwich
case. As these cases do show somewhat how far the police are willing to go with Simon.
In the Asbo case papers you have police saying in their statement they know Simon is always
insured it is on police file how much he was stopped. Yet he has around 8 cases at court for
no insurance. In addition, most of these cases he never had a summons for, and they found
him guilty due to him knowing nothing about the case was due to be in court.
Regards
Lorraine
From: Wood, Peter
mailto: Peter.Wood@canopius.com
Sent: 30 January 2015 17:02
To: Lorraine Cordell
Cc: Austin, Andrew; Donovan, Paul
Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell
Dear Simon,
Please find attached the following -