Page 215 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 215

I'm conscious we have not done a formal final response yet to your complaint, I intend to do
               this as soon as we receive full details of the recovery costs you incurred and can make a
               decision on compensation, I trust that’s acceptable.
               If you need anything else or have any questions in the meantime, please do not hesitate to
               contact us.
               I am keeping Andy in the loop as I am due to go on leave from 12/2/15 - 8/3/15 so he will
               need to pick up any issues that may arise during that time.
               We will be in touch shortly and await details from you as above in due course.
               King Regards Mr Peter Wood
               From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
               Date: 26 January 2015 23:10:04 GMT
               To: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com>
               Cc: complaints@lloyds.com <complaints@lloyds.com>
               Subject: Re: MT3574694
               Simon Cordell
               Dear Peter Wood
               Thank you for picking this up and taking the time to deal with this matter.
               418,
               The date of the appeal I do not have yet.
               I are waiting for this but the court and CPS said if I get the information needed before the
               court date then it could be sent to the court who found me guilty and the CPS and this would
               be linked to the case and addressed. In addition, there should be no need for the appeal court
               case.
               I am trying to do this so that a next day is not got to be wasted of my time in court and getting
               to and from the court.
               The day that the police officer pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which the
               police officer lied, and the police officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is
               14/11/2013.
               I think due to what the police officer said in court the CPS and judge would like to know the
               facts and what the police officer said on that phone call to KGM. In addition, when KGM
               spoke to the manager at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools, I
               think the reason for this is the police officer committed perjury in the court.
               That is why they asked me to get proof that my insurance was not void, section 9 witness
               statements as to what the police officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance,
               In addition, the facts how KGM found out I had in fact done nothing wrong and my insurance
               should not be cancelled.
               However, if you think a Letter of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be
               done I would be very grateful, but could you include in the letter only reason this has come
               about is due to what the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. In addition,
               this is the reason KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the
               insurance policy I had in force with them.
               This should cover it I hope as I really did nothing wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police
               officer lied to get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound and they told
               her there was no tools.
               The vehicle registration I was driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was
               included on my insurance. So should have shown on the database along with my car.
               However, none showed up as being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me
               all the problems with the police.
               As already aware yes, I was stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized.
   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220