Page 290 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

asked her if she could send the letter that was sent out by email to this email address. Could
all attached documents be attached to the case files please?
1571,
Regards
Lorraine Cordell
From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57
To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’
Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk'
Subject: Re: Simon Cordell
Dear Debbie Barnett
Thank you for taking the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Could
you please also confirm by email that you have this email. As explained, there have been a
number of issues with my son Simon Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981. The issues are one of not
being insured. When in fact he was. There was a case heard on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon
Magistrates' Court where my son Simon Cordell was found guilty. Of using his vehicle for
business purposes. This was only the case due to the police officer lying. Not just to KGM
who my son was insured with, but in his statement of facts, and also on oath to the judge and
CPS. The case is such that on the day my son was stopped the police office made a call to
KGM the police office told KGM that my son Simon Cordell had lots of tools in his van and
was doing odd jobs. Under my son insurance this would not have covered him, and the police
officer would have known this already as my son had given the police officer his policy at the
side of the road. My son was arrested and taken to the police station. Due to him refusing to
sign the seizer notice and telling the police officer he was lying and to arrest him. My sons
Van registration CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound, with no
tools in there. The police office when wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the
phone call but with something totally incorrect information. The judge asked the police office
at court about the tools as he saw emails from KGM the police office told the judge he knew
nothing about any tools. The police officer I believed new he could not put tools down in his
statement as calls was already being put into the police about complaints. So changed his
story in his statement. The facts are that there are audio tapes of what the police officer said
to KGM, and also the call that was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all
calls. I have both of the audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email
that a manager sent to Kelly Tiller at KGM. How can a police officer act in such a manner? I
really do not understand why he did this. As also said on the phone there is a number of
summons my son has not had regarding the other stops from police, these cases he has gone
to court without him knowing and he been found guilty when he did not even know there was
a case in court. I have sent many emails to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance
documents to the court. 2 case we had to do statutory declarations one for Willesden and one
for Bromley. The Willesden one seems to have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015
without us knowing again he was found guilty but they put this case under a new case
number looking at the letter so all the documents that were sent before was not with the court
file I would have through. But with both statutory declarations we added a copy of his
insurance. I have been trying for some time to get all of this put together so it can all be
addresses and so far, nothing has been done with all the emails I have sent to the court. We
also asked at court when we went to Wimbledon
1572,
Magistrates' Court but nothing was done. Could you please tell us where we can sort this out
about getting all the other cases addressed without the need to be going from one court to the
next. This is a waste of courts time and money when clearly all that is needed to be is check