Page 292 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

to someone who told me an appeal date has been set for the 05/03/2015 the crown court. I
have also spoke to Sheila today at the Crown court listing office where I told her that we had
not had any letters from the crown court she also told me that they did not get any emails I
sent over. I do not have the case number and asked her if she could send the letter that was
sent out by email to this email address. Could all attached documents be attached to the case
files please?
Regards
Lorraine Cordell
From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57
To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’
Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk'
Subject: Re: Simon Cordell
Dear Debbie Barnett
Thank you for taking the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Could
you please also confirm by email that you have this email. As explained, there have been a
number of issues with my son Simon Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981.the issues are one of not
being insured. When in fact he was. There was a case heard on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon
Magistrates' Court where my son Simon Cordell was found guilty. Of using his vehicle for
business purposes. This was only the case due to the police officer lying. Not just to KGM
who my son was insured with, but in his statement of facts, and also on oath to the judge and
CPS. The case is such that on the day my son was stopped the police office made a call to
KGM the police office told KGM that my son Simon Cordell had lots of tools in his van and
was doing odd jobs. Under my son insurance this would not have covered him, and the police
officer would have known this already as my son had given the police officer his policy at the
side of the road. My son was arrested and taken to the police station. Due to him refusing to
sign the seizer notice and telling the police officer he was lying and to arrest him. My sons
Van registration CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound, with no
tools in there. The police office when wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the
phone call but with something totally incorrect information. The judge asked the police office
at court about the tools as he saw emails from KGM the police office told the judge he knew
nothing about any tools. The police officer I believed new he could not put tools down in his
statement as calls was already being put into the police about complaints. So changed his
story in his statement the facts are that there are audio tapes of what the police officer said to
KGM, and also the call that was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all
calls. I have both of the audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email
that a manager sent to Kelly Tiller at KGM. How can a police officer act in such a manner? I
really do not understand why he did this.
1575,
As also said on the phone there is a number of summons my son has not had regarding the
other stops from police, these cases he has gone to court without him knowing and he been
found guilty when he did not even know there was a case in court. I have sent many emails to
get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to the court. 2 case we had to do
statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for Bromley. The Willesden one seems to
have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing again he was found guilty
but they put this case under a new case number looking at the letter so all the documents that
were sent before was not with the court file I would have through. But with both statutory
declarations we added a copy of his insurance. I have been trying for some time to get all of
this put together so it can all be addresses and so far, nothing has been done with all the
emails I have sent to the court. We also asked at court when we went to Wimbledon