Page 294 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’
Cc: 'listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk'; 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk'
Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell
Dear Debbie Barnett CPS: and Sheila from the Listing Office at the crown court. I did send
the below email with all attachments, but I don't think anyone got it due to its size. I am
resending it in 3 parts. Part 1 of 3 email Please see Attached files and please read below
email. could you please also let me know you have got this email. I did also call yesterday
and was told you was not in the office and spoke to someone who told me an appeal date has
been set for the 05/03/2015 the crown court. I have also spoke to Sheila today at the Crown
court listing office where I told her that we had not had any letters from the crown court she
also told me that they did not get any emails I sent over. I do not have the case number and
asked her if she could send the letter that was sent out by email to this email address. Could
all attached documents be attached to the case files please?
Regards
Lorraine Cordell
From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57
To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’
Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk'
Subject: Re: Simon Cordell
Dear Debbie Barnett
Thank you for taking the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Could
you please also confirm by email that you have this email.
1577,
As explained, there have been a number of issues with my son Simon Cordell DOB:
26/01/1981. The issues are one of not being insured. When in fact he was. There was a case
heard on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my son Simon Cordell was
found guilty. Of using his vehicle for business purposes. This was only the case due to the
police officer lying. Not just to KGM who my son was insured with, but in his statement of
facts, and also on oath to the judge and CPS. The case is such that on the day my son was
stopped the police office made a call to KGM the police office told KGM that my son Simon
Cordell had lots of tools in his van and was doing odd jobs. Under my son insurance this
would not have covered him, and the police officer would have known this already as my son
had given the police officer his policy at the side of the road. My son was arrested and taken
to the police station. Due to him refusing to sign the seizer notice and telling the police
officer he was lying and to arrest him. My sons Van registration CX52JRZ was seized and
taken to Chariton police vehicle pound, with no tools in there. The police office when wrote
his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call but with something totally
incorrect information. The judge asked the police office at court about the tools as he saw
emails from KGM the police office told the judge he knew nothing about any tools. The
police officer I believed new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls was already
being put into the police about complaints. So changed his story in his statement. The facts
are that there are audio tapes of what the police officer said to KGM, and also the call that
was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all calls. I have both of the audio
files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a manager sent to Kelly
Tiller at KGM. How can a police officer act in such a manner? I really do not understand why
he did this. As also said on the phone there is a number of summons my son has not had
regarding the other stops from police, these cases he has gone to court without him knowing
and he been found guilty when he did not even know there was a case in court. I have sent
many emails to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to the court. 2 case